Sunday, 31 May 2020

End Times according to Jesus



End Times according to Jesus - ESCHATOLOGY SERIES
(TO BE UPDATED)

    1. Matt 24 and Luke 21
    2. Wrong eschatology..?
    3. Days of Wrath ?
    4. The Desolation of Jerusalem and its Temple
    5. Did Jesus proclaim the day of Vengeance.?
    6. Did Jerusalem have 2 or 3 Temples?
    7. The 4 Popular Views of End Times
    8. Why Preterism is correct
    9. Destruction of Jerusalem's Temple (not one stone left upon another)
    10. The 3 Troubling Questions in Eschatology
    11. The Age to Come
    12. False Christs - Do not be tricked
    13. Wars, famines, pestilence, earthquakes - Not the End yet?
    14. What is the "Beginning of sorrows"
    15. Why is there a need for AD70 (destruction of Jerusalem and Temple).?
    16. Persecution for Jesus' sake - not the End yet.?
    17. False prophets will come - not the End yet.?
    18. Gospel to all the world - not the End yet.?
    19. Open the Seal - not the End yet.?
    20. The Abomination of Desolation (Part 1)
    21. The Abomination of Desolation (Part 2)
    22. 70 weeks - book of Daniel
    23. Flee to the Mountains
    24. 144,000 and 666 - Revelations
    25. The Great Tribulation
    26. Double Fulfillment of Prophecy?
    27. Do NOT Believe It.?
    28. The Coming of the Son of Man
    29. The Parousia
    30. Dead bodies and eagles
    31. Times of the Gentiles
    32. The Shaking of the Powers of the Heavens
    33. Signs in the Heavens / The Day of the Lord
    34. Is the "Mountain Peaks of Prophecy" Interpretation correct?
    35. The Sign of the Son of Man in heaven
    36. The Gathering of the elect
    37. Jesus Coming in His kingdom (the Kingdom of God)
    38. This Generation shall Not Pass Away (Part 1)
    39. This Generation shall Not Pass Away (Part 2)
    40. Heaven and Earth will pass away
    41. Like the days of Noah
    42. No one knows that Day or Hour
    43. Remember Lot's wife
    44. Faithful servant and evil servant
    45. Parable of the 5 wise virgins and 5 foolish virgins
    46. Is there a Rapture?
















OTHER WRITERS:


Saturday, 30 May 2020

Signs in the Heavens / The Day of the Lord











Signs in the Heavens / The Day of the Lord

When Jesus spoke about the shaking of the heavens in Matthew 24:29, He mentioned particularly the sun, moon and stars not giving their lights and also falling out from the sky.

In the 1st sermon by Peter after the ascension of Jesus we read of Peter saying these same words in Acts 2:16-21

Act 2:16  But this is what was uttered through the prophet Joel: 

Act 2:17  “‘And in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams; 

Act 2:18  even on my male servants and female servants in those days I will pour out my Spirit, and they shall prophesy. 

Act 2:19  And I will show wonders in the heavens above and signs on the earth below, blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke; 

Act 2:20  the sun shall be turned to darkness and the moon to blood, before the day of the Lord comes, the great and magnificent day. 

Act 2:21  And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.’ 


Peter is telling his audience that these are not my words (v16) but the fulfillment of the words of their prophet Joel in Joel 2:28-32. Peter did not dream it up or imagine these Jewish symbols. He was speaking in their Jewish culture and language that they understood.


To see the Context of how and why Peter talked about these heavenly bodies, we need to understand that prior to his sermon, the Holy Spirit came upon them on the day of Pentecost and filled all of them with visible fire on their heads and the ability to speak in tongues and foreign languages. Those inhabitants and visitors in Jerusalem were amazed at how these 120 disciples were able to speak their mother tongue and describe the mighty works of God and His kingdom. It was within this context that Peter began to tell them about the signs in the heavens, that there will be a great shaking of the heavenlies, and that if they were to put their faith in Jesus Christ, then salvation will come upon them.

Take note that this "salvation" that Peter was talking about was the saving from the shaking of the heavens and the earth. The building up of the signs in the heavens and earth is so that the listeners may be saved from the effects of these shakings. And we shall see later, what is the meaning of these  signs and shakings.

In verse 20, Peter says that these signs in the heavens and earth will precede the coming of the "Day of the Lord" and this day will be a great and glorious day. It will be a great and glorious day for those who will be saved but a terrible day of judgement for those not saved.


This "coming of the day of the Lord" or "coming of Jesus" is the same "coming of Jesus" in Matthew 24:3-13, where the disciples asked "when will be the sign of your coming?". And Jesus answered them by saying that when they see all these signs and events take place, they should flee to the mountains of Judea and then they will be saved. Saved from what? Saved from the coming of the "day of the Lord".

Peter, Joel and Jesus were all speaking of the same thing! Joel prophesied that the "day of the Lord" will come, Jesus said these are the signs of the coming of the "day of the Lord", and Peter said the "day of the Lord" is very near.


The "signs of the heavens" were synonymous with the "day of the Lord". Peter was using the same apocalyptic language about the sun, moon and stars not giving their lights (v19-20) and I have shown that this shaking of the heavens and the earth (signs of the heavens) refers to the judgement and shaking upon the people. The audience understood that the shaking of the sun, moon and stars is not a literal description and not meant to be a natural phenomenon but a metaphorical and symbolic in its meaning.

To the Jews, their nation, Temple and the holy city of Jerusalem was their "heavens and the earth". They were the sun, moon and stars. The judgement of God about heavens and earth being shaken, burnt up, falling down, not giving their lights, are all symbolic meanings of the destruction of natural Israel. This is the passing away of the old Israel and its performance based religion of Judaism together with all its practices.


Look at how God and the prophet Isaiah referred to Israel in Isaiah 51:16. This was what the Jewish nation thought of themselves based on their Scriptures. The heavens and earth is Israel, God's people.

Isa 51:16  And I have put my words in your mouth and covered you in the shadow of my hand, establishing the heavens and laying the foundations of the earth, and saying to Zion, ‘You are my people.’


In Acts 2:16-21, Peter, after the filling of the Holy Spirit, said that the signs in the heavens (the sun, moon and stars stop their lights) and signs on earth with blood, fire and smoke (the destruction of Jerusalem), will be just before the coming of the "day of the Lord".


Now let's look in depth about this phrase the "day of the Lord" in Acts 2:20. It is not a future "day of the coming of Jesus" but it is a past event that happened in AD70. It indicates the arrival of judgement.



Just the phrase alone the "day of the Lord" is a reference to the "judgement of God", so the coming of the "day of the Lord" is the coming of the "judgement of God".


Let us see how this is used in the Old Testament:

In Isaiah 13:6,9-10 we read about the prophecy of God's judgement against Babylon.

Isa 13:6  Wail, for the day of the LORD is near; as destruction from the Almighty it will come! 

Isa 13:9  Behold, the day of the LORD comes, cruel, with wrath and fierce anger, to make the land a desolation and to destroy its sinners from it. 

Isa 13:10  For the stars of the heavens and their constellations will not give their light; the sun will be dark at its rising, and the moon will not shed its light. 


In Isa 34:8 we read of "the day of the Lord's vengeance" speaking about the judgement of God against Idumea (v5) and Bozrah (v6) and it happened just the way Isaiah prophesied.

Isa 34:8  For the LORD has a day of vengeance, a year of recompense for the cause of Zion. 


In Ezekiel 30:2,3 the "day of the Lord" is considered a doom day for Egypt.

Eze 30:2  Son of man, prophesy, and say, Thus says the Lord GOD: “Wail, Alas for the day!" 

Eze 30:3  For the day is near, the day of the LORD is near; it will be a day of clouds, a time of doom for the nations. 


In Joel 1:15 the "day of the Lord" is near meaning the destruction of God on Israel is near.

Joe 1:15  Alas for the day! For the day of the LORD is near, and as destruction from the Almighty it comes. 


In Joel 2:1 the "day of the Lord" is coming meaning that the alarm must be sounded for the judgement of God and the people will tremble.

Joe 2:1  Blow a trumpet in Zion; sound an alarm on my holy mountain! Let all the inhabitants of the land tremble, for the day of the LORD is coming; it is near, 


In Joel 3:14,15 the "day of the Lord" is near with the sun, moon and stars darkened showing that judgement of God is on the nations.

Joe 3:14  Multitudes, multitudes, in the valley of decision! For the day of the LORD is near in the valley of decision. 

Joe 3:15  The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw their shining. 


In Zeph 1:7,14 we read of the "day of the Lord" is coming to mean that the judgement of God on Jerusalem is coming and it will be a day of wrath.

Zep 1:7  Be silent before the Lord GOD! For the day of the LORD is near; the LORD has prepared a sacrifice and consecrated his guests. 

Zep 1:14  The great day of the LORD is near, near and hastening fast; the sound of the day of the LORD is bitter; the mighty man cries aloud there. 


In Zech 14:1 the coming of the "day of the Lord" is when God brings all the nations to battle against Jerusalem.

Zec 14:1  Behold, a day is coming for the LORD, when the spoil taken from you will be divided in your midst. 


In Jeremiah 46:10 the "day of the Lord" is the day of vengeance by God on His enemies.

Jer 46:10  That day is the day of the Lord GOD of hosts, a day of vengeance, to avenge himself on his foes. 


In Amos 5:18,20 the "day of the Lord" is a day of darkness and gloom.

Amo 5:18  Woe to you who desire the day of the LORD! Why would you have the day of the LORD? It is darkness, and not light, 

Amo 5:20  Is not the day of the LORD darkness, and not light, and gloom with no brightness in it? 


From the above, you can read from the Scriptures what the "day of the Lord" means.

Let us look at an  extra-biblical source on the meaning of the "day of the Lord".


CD Alexander, a bible scholar wrote on his commentary on Joel 2:

[  an adequate study of prophecy would soon teach that the figures used in this prophecy, signs in heaven and earth, the darkening of the sun and the moon, blood, fire and vapor of smoke have nothing to do with the end of the world but with the end of  the Old Covenant and its earthly administration in the Jewish state. The same figures are frequently used in the Old Testament to denote the removal or the overthrow of kingdoms, powers and ordinances. See Isaiah 13, for example as those that were used to overthrow a Babylonian kingdom.

Peter's quotation was a warning to the Jewish people of his own day, that the time of the removal of their order had come. Their kingdom and state were about to go down in blood. Their sun was about to set as it took place in AD70 when nation and Temple was destroyed by the Romans.  ]


Look into Luke 21 in the New Testament which is a parallel passage to Matthew 24.

Luke 21:22 states that the "day of the Lord" is also called the "day of vengeance". All these signs mentioned before this verse are the signs of the coming of the "days of vengeance" and all of them are going to be fulfilled.

Luk 21:22  for these are days of vengeance, to fulfill all that is written. 

After those days in Luke 21:22, there is nothing left to be fulfilled about the "days of vengeance" in the future. All of them have been fulfilled according to Jesus.


Question: Were the early church expecting any literal signs in the heavens?

Answer: Yes, there were some written in non-biblical records and in historical writings. Luke 21:25-26 says there will be some signs IN the sun, moon and stars and these will cause the sea and the waves to create loud sounds. It does not say anything about the sun, moon and stars falling to the earth (symbolic meaning), but it says the signs will be IN the sun, moon and stars.

Luk 21:25  And there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth distress of nations in perplexity because of the roaring of the sea and the waves, 

Luk 21:26  people fainting with fear and with foreboding of what is coming on the world. For the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 


Let us see some historical writings of FW Farrar in his book "The early days of Christianity" in 1886. On page 416 it says:

[  In Jerusalem, men told how at the Passover of AD65, a mysterious light had gleamed for 3 hours at midnight in the holiest place. How the enormous gates of brass which required the exertions of 20 men to move, had opened of themselves and could not be closed. How at Pentecost, priests had heard sounds as of departing deities who said to each other "Let us depart from here".  ]


According to Flavius Josephus, a Roman historian of the 1st Century, who was an eye-witness to the events happening at Jerusalem, wrote in his book "War of the Jews. Vol. 1"

[  While they did not attempt nor give credit to the signs that were so evident, and did so plainly foretell their future desolation but like men infatuated without either eyes to see or minds to consider, did not regard the denunciations that God made to them.

Thus there was a star resembling a sword which stood over the city and a comet that continued a whole year. Thus also before the Jewish rebellion and before those commotions which preceded the war when the people were coming in great crowds to the feast of unleavened bread on the 8th day of the month of Nisan (Xanthicus), at the ninth hour of the night. So great a light shone around the altar and the holy house that it appeared to be bright daytime which light lasted for half an hour. This light seemed to be a good sign to the unskilled but was so interpreted by the sacred scribes as to portend those events that followed immediately upon it.

At the same festival also, a heifer as she was led by the high priest to be sacrificed brought forth a lamb in the middle of the Temple. Moreover the Eastern Gate of the Inner Court of the Temple, which was made of brass and vastly heavy and had been with difficulty shut by 20 men, and rested upon bases armed with iron and had bolts fastened very deep into the firm floor which was there made of one entire stone, was seen to be opened of its own accord on the 6th hour of the night. Now those who kept watch in the Temple came here upon running to the captain of the Temple and told him of it, who then came up thither and not without great difficulty was able to shut the gate again.

But the men of learning understood it. That the security of their holy house was dissolved of its own accord. And that the gate was opened for the advantage of their enemies. So they publicly declared that this signal foreshadowed the desolation that was coming upon them.

Besides these, a few days after the feast on the 21st day of the month of Iyar, a certain prodigious and incredible phenomenon appeared. I suppose the account of it would seemed to be a fable were it not related by those that saw it and were not the events that followed it of so considerable in nature as to deserve such signals.

For before sunset, chariots and troops of soldiers in their armor were sen running about among the clouds and surrounding the city. Moreover at the feast which we call Pentecost, as the priests were going by night into the Inner Court of the Temple, as their custom was to perform their sacred ministrations, they said that in the first place, they felt a quaking and they heard a great noise and after that they heard a sound as of a great multitude saying "Let us remove hence".  ]


Josephus said it sounds like fable. You can believe it or not but when you read the writings of these historians, it is indeed an incredible account of the signs and wonders in the heavens that cannot be just simply explained away. Furthermore these are eye-witnesses accounts.


See a write up on the "day of the Lord" :


Note: The New Testament calls the "day of the Lord" by other terms as well such as "days of wrath", "days of vengeance", "day of visitation", "great day of Almighty God", "last days (of Moses Old Covenant)", "day of our Lord Jesus Christ", "day of God". And that this day will come suddenly like a thief in the night (1 The 5:2; 2 Pet 3:10).

We conclude by seeing how did the prophet Zephaniah describe this "day of the Lord".

According to Zephaniah 1:14-16, the "day of the Lord" is also called:
- that day will be a day of wrath
- a day of distress and anguish
- a day of trouble and ruin
- a day of darkness and gloom
- a day of clouds and blackness
- a day of trumpet and battle cry.

Friday, 29 May 2020

The Shaking of the Powers of the Heavens











The Shaking of the Powers of the Heavens

These words looks like they come out from a science fiction movie, but they are actually found in the bible in Mat 24:29.

Mat 24:29  “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken."



Compare this verse with David's writing in Psalms 18:7-13, where it says:

Psa 18:7  Then the earth reeled and rocked; the foundations also of the mountains trembled and quaked, because he was angry. 

Psa 18:8  Smoke went up from his nostrils, and devouring fire from his mouth; glowing coals flamed forth from him. 

Psa 18:9  He bowed the heavens and came down; thick darkness was under his feet. 

Psa 18:10  He rode on a cherub and flew; he came swiftly on the wings of the wind. 

Psa 18:11  He made darkness his covering, his canopy around him, thick clouds dark with water. 

Psa 18:12  Out of the brightness before him hailstones and coals of fire broke through his clouds. 

Psa 18:13  The LORD also thundered in the heavens, and the Most High uttered his voice, hailstones and coals of fire. 


Q: What was Psalms 18 written by David about?

A: These words actually belong to a Song (Psalm) of David. "A Psalm of David, the servant of the LORD, who addressed the words of this song to the LORD on the day when the LORD delivered him from the hand of all his enemies, and from the hand of Saul." David was singing about his deliverance from King Saul in battle, and using Jewish metaphors to describe the judgement of God coming down on his enemies.

This battle going on between David and Saul is described in 2 Samuel 21. In fact, after the battle the same song was also recorded in 2 Samuel 22, where these Hebrew metaphors were used. David was a great song or poem writer who used lots of symbols and Jewish metaphors to bring colors to his words.

Mat 24:29 is no different, when Jesus talks to His disciples about the heavenly bodies being shaken. Do stars literally fall from the sky? Are stars in the sky or in the outer galaxies? Can the sun be darkened or the moon gives out light? Of course not. These are languages that Jews understand, and that the 21st Century reader must not take it literally. By the way, these words were actually written in ancient Hebrew, and translated into Greek, then into Latin, and then into English.


Let us look at Old Testament apocalyptic language being used by writers and prophets especially on judgments that were impending on the people. These prophetic words were later fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.


In Isaiah 13:9-13 we read of the prophecy predicting the fall of the Babylonian (Isa 13:1) empire to the Medes (or Persians). This happened in 539BC, about more than 500 years before the writings of the New Testament.

Isa 13:9  Behold, the day of the LORD comes, cruel, with wrath and fierce anger, to make the land a desolation and to destroy its sinners from it. 

Isa 13:10  For the stars of the heavens and their constellations will not give their light; the sun will be dark at its rising, and the moon will not shed its light

Isa 13:11  I will punish the world for its evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; I will put an end to the pomp of the arrogant, and lay low the pompous pride of the ruthless. 

See a write up on the Fall of Babylon in 539BC:


In Ezekiel 32:7-8, we read of the prophecy predicting the war against the Pharaoh and Egypt (Eze 32:2) and it was later fulfilled.

Eze 32:7  And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light

Eze 32:8  All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over thee, and set darkness upon thy land, saith the Lord GOD. 


In Amos 8:9, we read of the prophecy predicting the judgement of the Jews of the Northern Kingdom.

Amo 8:9  And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord GOD, that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the clear day: 


These verses are written in apocalyptic language that the Jews understand and it is in similar style with Matthew 24:29. Futurists and dispensationalists take these verses literally as some sort of cosmic phenomenon in the heavenly bodies in the future, not understanding audience relevance of the Jews. But to the Jewish listeners who are familiar with Old Testament scriptures, the Torah and their prophetic writings, it is common metaphorical language.

Another example of metaphorical words is Daniel 8:9-10. Imagine a goat's horn growing so big that it reaches the heavens and bring down some of the stars to trample.

Dan 8:9  Out of one of them came a little horn, which grew exceedingly great toward the south, toward the east, and toward the glorious land. 

Dan 8:10  It grew great, even to the host of heaven. And some of the host and some of the stars it threw down to the ground and trampled on them. 


Another example in Isaiah 34:3-4, where the mountains will be melted with blood, the stars of heaven will be dissolved, the heavens will be rolled up like a scroll, and the heavenly hosts will fall down like leaves. These are symbolic words of punishment on the cities of Idumea (Edom) and Bozrah. And they were fulfilled when the cities were destroyed. Isaiah was prophesying that the judgement on these two cities is  going to take place.

Isa 34:3  Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcases, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood. 

Isa 34:4  And all the host of heaven shall be dissolved, and the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll: and all their host shall fall down, as the leaf falleth off from the vine, and as a falling fig from the fig tree. 

Isa 34:9  And the streams of Edom shall be turned into pitch, and her soil into sulfur; her land shall become burning pitch.
 
Isa 34:10  Night and day it shall not be quenched; its smoke shall go up forever. From generation to generation it shall lie waste; none shall pass through it forever and ever. 

Isaiah write of  the streams will turn to pitch and the soil into sulfur forever and ever. But if you go to the land of Edom in the Middle East today, the rivers are not pitch and the soil is not sulfur. In fact, people can still pass through them. It was  not forever and ever. It was  symbolic and metaphorical language, and not to be taken literally. Isaiah used these metaphors to show the severity of the judgement on them.


We find similar apocalyptic words in the New Testament in Rev 6:13-14 where John was given a vision in parallel to the judgement of Jerusalem in Mat 24:29.

Rev 6:13  and the stars of the sky fell to the earth as the fig tree sheds its winter fruit when shaken by a gale. 

Rev 6:14  The sky vanished like a scroll that is being rolled up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place. 

This is symbolism saying the stars of heaven falling to the earth, heavens will vanish and rolled up like a scroll, mountains and islands will be displaced. The New Testament and Old Testament apocalyptic language is identical. So Matthew 24:29 is symbolic language found in the language and culture and style of the Old Testament scripture.


Let's look at how the author of Hebrews wrote to the Jews. Hebrews was written a few years before the fall of Jerusalem and the Temple in AD70. Many say it was most probably written by apostle Paul or someone familiar and concerned with the Jewish nation. The author was writing to the Jews who were leaving the Moses Old Covenant and became believers in Jesus Christ so that they do not go back to it. And to go back would be like trampling on the blood of Jesus again. Read Hebrews 9.

In Hebrews 12, the author warned the Jews that they do not reject Jesus who is from heaven, and He is going to shake the heavens and the earth very soon. In return Jesus will bring in a kingdom that cannot be shaken.

Heb 12:25  See that you do not refuse Him who speaks. For if they did not escape, those who refused him that spoke on earth, much more we shall not escape if we turn away from Him who speaks from Heaven, 

Heb 12:26  whose voice then shook the earth; but now He has promised, saying, "Yet once more I will not only shake the earth, but also the heavens.

Heb 12:27  And this word, "Yet once more," signifies the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that have been made, so that the things which cannot be shaken may remain. 

Heb 12:28  Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us have grace, by which we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear, 

The author was quoting the book of Haggai chapter 2, and indicated that a judgement that is happening right in their midst. God is bringing about a shaking so big that it will remove them (the Temple) and replaced with things that cannot be shaken and that is the kingdom of God. It happened in AD70 when Israel, Jerusalem and the Temple would fall and 1.3 million Jews were killed by the Romans according to the historian Flavius Josephus. This is the event referred to as "the sun would darkened" and "the moon will not give out light", and the "powers of heavens will be shaken".


We also read earlier in Daniel 7:13-14, that the Son of Man (Jesus) is coming before the Ancient of Days (God) and receiving a kingdom that will last forever and ever, and cannot be shaken.

When Jesus was on the earth 2000 years ago, Jesus came preaching the gospel of the kingdom saying that the kingdom of God is already at hand (Mat 3:2; Mat 4:17; Mat 10:7; Mark 1:15; Luke 21:31). It is not far in the future but it is already among them, at hand.

Paul told the Colossian church that they have been taken out of the kingdom of darkness and delivered into the kingdom of His Son (Colossians 1:13).

All these shows that we are already placed in the kingdom of God that cannot be shaken. 

Coming back to the book of Hebrews, God is shaking up the things  that can be shaken so that He can remove them. All through the book of Hebrews from chapters 1 to 12, we read of the author systematically telling the audience that the Old Covenant has no more significance, and that Jesus is bringing in the New Covenant that is the kingdom that cannot be shaken. The author repeatedly says that Jesus is better than Moses, Aaron, the priesthood, angels, and the Temple. All these are going to pass away. It is going to be shaken and never applicable anymore.

In Jewish culture they understand that the "heavens" refer to the Temple. God has removed the old system of performance based religion of the Temple so that He can FULLY brings in the New Covenant.

Heb 8:13  In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away

In Heb 8:13, we read of the Old Covenant is already obsolete, and it will vanish away.
When did it became obsolete? At the Cross, when Jesus became the sacrificial lamb that took away the sin of the world. God did not accept any more animal sacrifices after that. The old sacrifices had no more meaning anymore.
When did it vanish away? At the destruction of the Temple when all the religions system of Judaism and sacrifices were done away with. All the practices and paraphernalia established by the presence of the Temple building were stopped with the destruction of the Temple.

The Old Covenant had been rolled up like a scroll and kept away. The sun and moon had stopped giving out light. The heavens of Moses Old Covenant was shaken and we are left with the kingdom of God that cannot be shaken.


John L Bray in his book "Matthew 24 Fulfilled" wrote this about the sun, moon and stars:

[  Jewish writers understood the light to mean the law. The sun represents the king. The moon was the Sanhedrin and the stars were the rabbis.  ]


Look at how Isaiah called Israel (Zion). God called Israel as the heavens and the earth.

Isa 51:16  And I have put my words in your mouth and covered you in the shadow of my hand, establishing the heavens and laying the foundations of the earth, and saying to Zion, ‘You are my people.’” 


Right early in Genesis 37:9, when Joseph had a dream. He saw the sun, moon and stars bow down and worship him. And this dream was fulfilled when Jacob and his sons had to submit to Joseph when he was in Egypt. By the way, Jacob and his wife did not literally bow down in the flesh to Joseph.

Gen 37:9  Then he dreamed another dream and told it to his brothers and said, “Behold, I have dreamed another dream. Behold, the sun, the moon, and eleven stars were bowing down to me.” 

Gen 37:10  But when he told it to his father and to his brothers, his father rebuked him and said to him, “What is this dream that you have dreamed? Shall I and your mother and your brothers indeed come to bow ourselves to the ground before you?” 

His father, Jacob (later renamed Israel) had 12 sons, who later became the 12 tribes of Israel. Jacob was a Jew and he understood the cultural meaning of sun, moon and stars. This was in their mindset. The heavenly bodies represent Jacob and their family members. This was common Jewish symbolism. Jesus said in Mat 24:29 that the powers of heaven will be shaken, meaning that Israel will be shaken at the event of the great tribulation (Mat 24:21,29).

See a write up about Jacob:


In Jewish culture, the darkening of the sun, moon and stars and the shaking of heavenly bodies is always interpreted as a bad omen, that a great calamity or disaster is soon going to come. They are taken as astrological signs foreshadowing that a great tragedy is about to occur.

We read this in Joel 2:10-11 where Joel prophesied about Jesus coming with His armies in judgement, and the sun, moon and stars were darkened before the army arrives.

Joe 2:10  The earth quakes before them; the heavens tremble. The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw their shining

Joe 2:11  The LORD utters his voice before his army, for his camp is exceedingly great; he who executes his word is powerful. For the day of the LORD is great and very awesome; who can endure it? 

In Luke 21:25-27, we also read of the signs in the sun, moon and star at the start of the great tribulation mentioned in Mat 24:29.

Luk 21:25  “And there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth distress of nations in perplexity because of the roaring of the sea and the waves, 

Luk 21:26  people fainting with fear and with foreboding of what is coming on the world. For the powers of the heavens will be shaken

Luk 21:27  And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 

Noticed that the shaking of the heavens occurs concurrently with the coming of the Son of Man, and the great tribulation. It is not after, but definitely before or at the same time.

In the Old Testament the shaking of the powers of heavens and earth is always related to judgement upon people:

Jeremiah 4:23-28 speaks about the prophecy by Jeremiah on the destruction of the kingdom of Judah at the hands of the Babylonian armiy in the 6th Century BC. He called it the destruction of heaven and earth.

Isaiah 13:9-13 speaks about the prophecy by Isaiah predicting the fall of Babylon. He said the sun, moon and stars will no longer give any light, and they will tremble.

Ezekiel 32:7-9 speaks about the prophecy by Ezekiel to the Pharaoh of Egypt on how the judgement of God will be upon them. The stars, sun and moon will stop giving light to them and their destruction will be known among the nations.

All of these passages use the apocalyptic language of poetry and symbolism about the destruction of heavens and earth to describe judgement of God on people. These are basically poetry and not to be taken literally like news in a newspaper. The heavenly bodies and earth do not physically passed away in AD70 during the Jewish Roman War, just as the sky and the stars did not dissolve and the heavens rolled away during the fall of Egypt, Judah and Babylon in the 6th Century BC.

The audience in Revelations 6:12-14 and in 2 Peter 3, understood that the "destruction of the heavens and earth" does not mean the complete destruction of all of creation.


CONCLUSION

We know in Isaiah 51:16 that God called Zion (Israel) the heavens and the earth.

So the passing away of heavens and earth refers to the passing away of Israel (Mat 5:18; Mat 24:35; Mark 13:31; Luke 21:33).

The shaking of the heavens and earth refers to the judgement and shaking that came upon the nation of Israel.

Q: When will the shaking take place according to Matthew 24:29?

A: It will take place IMMEDIATELY after the tribulation of those days. What days? the days of great tribulation in Matthew 24:15-28.

Q: Will it happen in our future?

A: NO. It happened in THAT GENERATION just as Jesus said it would in Luke 21:31.

Luk 21:31  So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that the kingdom of God is near. 

Luk 21:32  Truly, I say to you, THIS GENERATION will not pass away until all has taken place. 

Luk 21:33  Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. 

ALL that Jesus said came true because it came to pass as the times of the Gentiles (Roman army) was fulfilled in AD7O when Jerusalem was trampled upon by Gentiles.

This is NOT in the future.




Thursday, 28 May 2020

Where does the Old Testament predict the coming of Jesus Christ?













Question: "Where does the Old Testament predict the coming of Jesus Christ?"

Answer: 
There are many Old Testament prophecies about Jesus Christ. Some interpreters place the number of Messianic prophecies in the hundreds. The following are those that are considered the clearest and most important.

Regarding Jesus’ birth—Isaiah 7:14: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.” Isaiah 9:6: “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” Micah 5:2: “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

Concerning Jesus’ ministry and death—Zechariah 9:9: “Rejoice greatly, O Daughter of Zion! Shout, Daughter of Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and having salvation, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” Psalm 22:16-18: “Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones; people stare and gloat over me. They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing.”

Likely the clearest prophecy about Jesus is the entire 53rd chapter of Isaiah. Isaiah 53:3-7 is especially unmistakable: “He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.”

The “seventy sevens” prophecy in Daniel chapter 9 predicted the precise date that Jesus, the Messiah, would be “cut off.” Isaiah 50:6 accurately describes the beating that Jesus endured. Zechariah 12:10 predicts the “piercing” of the Messiah, which occurred after Jesus died on the cross. Many more examples could be provided, but these will suffice. The Old Testament most definitely prophesies the coming of Jesus as the Messiah.

Why should I believe in Christ’s resurrection?












Question: "Why should I believe in Christ’s resurrection?"

Answer: It is a fairly well-established fact that Jesus Christ was publicly executed in Judea in the 1st Century A.D., under Pontius Pilate, by means of crucifixion, at the behest of the Jewish Sanhedrin. The non-Christian historical accounts of Flavius Josephus, Cornelius Tacitus, Lucian of Samosata, Maimonides and even the Jewish Sanhedrin corroborate the early Christian eyewitness accounts of these important historical aspects of the death of Jesus Christ.


As for His resurrection, there are several lines of evidence which make for a compelling case. The late jurisprudential prodigy and international statesman Sir Lionel Luckhoo (of The Guinness Book of World Records fame for his unprecedented 245 consecutive defense murder trial acquittals) epitomized Christian enthusiasm and confidence in the strength of the case for the resurrection when he wrote, “I have spent more than 42 years as a defense trial lawyer appearing in many parts of the world and am still in active practice. I have been fortunate to secure a number of successes in jury trials and I say unequivocally the evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that it compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no room for doubt.”


The secular community’s response to the same evidence has been predictably apathetic in accordance with their steadfast commitment to methodological naturalism. For those unfamiliar with the term, methodological naturalism is the human endeavor of explaining everything in terms of natural causes and natural causes only. If an alleged historical event defies natural explanation (e.g., a miraculous resurrection), secular scholars generally treat it with overwhelming skepticism, regardless of the evidence, no matter how favorable and compelling it may be.


In our view, such an unwavering allegiance to natural causes regardless of substantive evidence to the contrary is not conducive to an impartial (and therefore adequate) investigation of the evidence. We agree with Dr. Wernher von Braun and numerous others who still believe that forcing a popular philosophical predisposition upon the evidence hinders objectivity. Or in the words of Dr. von Braun, “To be forced to believe only one conclusion… would violate the very objectivity of science itself.”


Having said that, let us now examine several lines of evidence for Christ’s resurrection.


The First Line of Evidence for Christ’s resurrection

To begin with, we have demonstrably sincere eyewitness testimony. Early Christian apologists cited hundreds of eyewitnesses, some of whom documented their own alleged experiences. Many of these eyewitnesses willfully and resolutely endured prolonged torture and death rather than repudiate their testimony. This fact attests to their sincerity, ruling out deception on their part. According to the historical record (The Book of Acts 4:1-17; Pliny’s Letters to Trajan X, 97, etc) most Christians could end their suffering simply by renouncing the faith. Instead, it seems that most opted to endure the suffering and proclaim Christ’s resurrection unto death.

Granted, while martyrdom is remarkable, it is not necessarily compelling. It does not validate a belief so much as it authenticates a believer (by demonstrating his or her sincerity in a tangible way). What makes the earliest Christian martyrs remarkable is that they knew whether or not what they were professing was true. They either saw Jesus Christ alive-and-well after His death or they did not. This is extraordinary. If it was all just a lie, why would so many perpetuate it given their circumstances? Why would they all knowingly cling to such an unprofitable lie in the face of persecution, imprisonment, torture, and death?

While the September 11, 2001, suicide hijackers undoubtedly believed what they professed (as evidenced by their willingness to die for it), they could not and did not know if it was true. They put their faith in traditions passed down to them over many generations. In contrast, the early Christian martyrs were the first generation. Either they saw what they claimed to see, or they did not.

Among the most illustrious of the professed eyewitnesses were the Apostles. They collectively underwent an undeniable change following the alleged post-resurrection appearances of Christ. Immediately following His crucifixion, they hid in fear for their lives. Following the resurrection they took to the streets, boldly proclaiming the resurrection despite intensifying persecution. What accounts for their sudden and dramatic change? It certainly was not financial gain. The Apostles gave up everything they had to preach the resurrection, including their lives.


The Second Line of Evidence for Christ’s resurrection

A second line of evidence concerns the conversion of certain key skeptics, most notably Paul and James. Paul was of his own admission a violent persecutor of the early Church. After what he described as an encounter with the resurrected Christ, Paul underwent an immediate and drastic change from a vicious persecutor of the Church to one of its most prolific and selfless defenders. Like many early Christians, Paul suffered impoverishment, persecution, beatings, imprisonment, and execution for his steadfast commitment to Christ’s resurrection.

James was skeptical, though not as hostile as Paul. A purported post-resurrection encounter with Christ turned him into an inimitable believer, a leader of the Church in Jerusalem. We still have what scholars generally accept to be one of his letters to the early Church. Like Paul, James willingly suffered and died for his testimony, a fact which attests to the sincerity of his belief (see The Book of Acts and Josephus’ Antiquities of the Jews XX, ix, 1).


The Third and Fourth Lines of Evidence for Christ’s resurrection

A third line and fourth line of evidence concern enemy attestation to the empty tomb and the fact that faith in the resurrection took root in Jerusalem. Jesus was publicly executed and buried in Jerusalem. It would have been impossible for faith in His resurrection to take root in Jerusalem while His body was still in the tomb where the Sanhedrin could exhume it, put it on public display, and thereby expose the hoax. Instead, the Sanhedrin accused the disciples of stealing the body, apparently in an effort to explain its disappearance (and therefore an empty tomb). How do we explain the fact of the empty tomb? Here are the three most common explanations:

First, the disciples stole the body. If this were the case, they would have known the resurrection was a hoax. They would not therefore have been so willing to suffer and die for it. (See the first line of evidence concerning demonstrably sincere eyewitness testimony.) All of the professed eyewitnesses would have known that they hadn’t really seen Christ and were therefore lying. With so many conspirators, surely someone would have confessed, if not to end his own suffering then at least to end the suffering of his friends and family. The first generation of Christians were absolutely brutalized, especially following the conflagration in Rome in A.D. 64 (a fire which Nero allegedly ordered to make room for the expansion of his palace, but which he blamed on the Christians in Rome in an effort to exculpate himself). As the Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus recounted in his Annals of Imperial Rome (published just a generation after the fire):

“Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired.” (Annals, XV, 44)

Nero illuminated his garden parties with Christians whom he burnt alive. Surely someone would have confessed the truth under the threat of such terrible pain. The fact is, however, we have no record of any early Christian denouncing the faith to end his suffering. Instead, we have multiple accounts of post-resurrection appearances and hundreds of eyewitnesses willing to suffer and die for it.

If the disciples didn’t steal the body, how else do we explain the empty tomb? Some have suggested that Christ faked His death and later escaped from the tomb. This is patently absurd. According to the eyewitness testimony, Christ was beaten, tortured, lacerated, and stabbed. He suffered internal damage, massive blood loss, asphyxiation, and a spear through His heart. There is no good reason to believe that Jesus Christ (or any other man for that matter) could survive such an ordeal, fake His death, sit in a tomb for three days and nights without medical attention, food or water, remove the massive stone which sealed His tomb, escape undetected (without leaving behind a trail of blood), convince hundreds of eyewitnesses that He was resurrected from the death and in good health, and then disappear without a trace. Such a notion is ridiculous.


The Fifth Line of Evidence for Christ’s resurrection

Finally, a fifth line of evidence concerns a peculiarity of the eyewitness testimony. In all of the major resurrection narratives, women are credited as the first and primary eyewitnesses. This would be an odd invention since in both the ancient Jewish and Roman cultures women were severely disesteemed. Their testimony was regarded as insubstantial and dismissible. Given this fact, it is highly unlikely that any perpetrators of a hoax in 1st Century Judea would elect women to be their primary witnesses. Of all the male disciples who claimed to see Jesus resurrected, if they all were lying and the resurrection was a scam, why did they pick the most ill-perceived, distrusted witnesses they could find?

Dr. William Lane Craig explains, “When you understand the role of women in first-century Jewish society, what’s really extraordinary is that this empty tomb story should feature women as the discoverers of the empty tomb in the first place. Women were on a very low rung of the social ladder in first-century Israel. There are old rabbinical sayings that said, 'Let the words of Law be burned rather than delivered to women' and 'blessed is he whose children are male, but woe to him whose children are female.' Women’s testimony was regarded as so worthless that they weren’t even allowed to serve as legal witnesses in a Jewish court of Law. In light of this, it’s absolutely remarkable that the chief witnesses to the empty tomb are these women... Any later legendary account would have certainly portrayed male disciples as discovering the tomb - Peter or John, for example. The fact that women are the first witnesses to the empty tomb is most plausibly explained by the reality that - like it or not - they were the discoverers of the empty tomb! This shows that the Gospel writers faithfully recorded what happened, even if it was embarrassing. This bespeaks the historicity of this tradition rather than its legendary status." (Dr. William Lane Craig, quoted by Lee Strobel, The Case For Christ, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998, p. 293)


In Summary

These lines of evidence: the demonstrable sincerity of the eyewitnesses (and in the Apostles’ case, compelling, inexplicable change), the conversion and demonstrable sincerity of key antagonists- and skeptics-turned-martyrs, the fact of the empty tomb, enemy attestation to the empty tomb, the fact that all of this took place in Jerusalem where faith in the resurrection began and thrived, the testimony of the women, the significance of such testimony given the historical context; all of these strongly attest to the historicity of the resurrection. We encourage our readers to thoughtfully consider these evidences. What do they suggest to you? Having pondered them ourselves, we resolutely affirm Sir Lionel’s declaration:

“The evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that it compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no room for doubt.”


gotquestions.org