Saturday, 9 May 2020

Flee to the Mountains





Flee to the Mountains

This phrase "flee to the mountains" is found in Mat 24:16; Mark 13:14; Luk 21:21

Let's look at Matthew:

Mat 24:16  Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains

Mat 24:17  Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: 

Mat 24:18  Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
 
Mat 24:19  And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! 

Mat 24:20  But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day.


The Jewish historian Josephus tells us that the general Caius Cestius Gallus of the Roman armies, was the 1st of all the generals to initiate an attack on the city of Jerusalem. He attacked the surrounding walls (which was acting as a protection wall) for 5 days and after that he stopped. He didn't continue his attack for certain reasons. It was during this period of non-attack mode, that the Jews came out and killed 5300 Roman soldiers and chased the armies away.

See a write up on the general:

From the account, it seems that the Jewish army was winning against the Romans. However, Josephus noticed a rather peculiar happening, and that is many of the eminent Jews ran away from the city, like those fleeing from a ship about to sink. Josephus couldn't understand why the Jews left the city after a short victory over the Romans.

Josephus was a Jew who became a Roman citizen. He was not a Christian and so he did not write from a spiritual perspective but wrote everything as he saw.

Eusebius, who is a Christian and one of the earliest church historian, was a 3rd Century church leader and writer. In fact, he has the only surviving written accounts of the church history in the 1st 300 years. There were very few written accounts and whatever was written by other church leaders could have been lost or destroyed in the war.

See:

In Eusebius book "History of the Church: page 111" he wrote:

[  Furthermore the members of the Jerusalem church, by means of an oracle given by revelation to acceptable persons there, were ordered to leave the city before the War began, and settled in a town in Perea called Pella. To Pella, those who believed in Christ migrated from Jerusalem, and as if holy men had utterly abandoned the royal metropolis of the Jews and the entire Jewish land. The judgement of God at last overtook them for the abominable crimes against Christ and His apostles, completely blotting out that wicked generation from among men.. ]

Q: What was that oracle given by revelation?
A: It was Matthew 24:16 (see above).

This was the common knowledge among Christians even from the 1st Century. When they saw Caius start the assault they just fled, even though the Jewish army enjoyed a short victory over the Romans. For the Christians, they did not see it as a victory for Jerusalem. They took it as a fulfillment of Jesus warning according to Mat 24:16. Jesus ask them to leave, so they left.

John Gill, a respected bible scholar and theologian, said in his book "Exposition of the New Testament (1852)" with regard to Mat 24:16.

[  It is remarked by certain interpreters, that which Josephus took noticed off with surprise, that Caius having advanced to Jerusalem and besieged it, all of a sudden without any cause, raised the siege and withdraw his army when the city might have easily been taken. By which means, a signal was made and an opportunity given to the Christians to make their escape. Which they accordingly did, and went over to Jordan, as Eusebius said to a place called Pella. So when Titus came a few months later to destroy the city, there was not a Christian in Jerusalem anymore.  ]

It looks like the Christians took Jesus warnings very seriously in that generation. It was a life and death decision. When they saw the armies start to surround Jerusalem, they fled.





In Mat 24:17-20 Jesus gave very specific and detailed instructions to His disciples.

v17 - make haste, and don't waste any time. If you are on the housetop, don't go back into the house. Don't return to take anything. The flat roof of those days has access to the outside of the building. They also have walkways leading from one housetop to another. The Jews spent lots of time on the housetops. It was like another room to them, maybe to escape the heat or for greater fresh air. With the warning, they can easily jump down from housetop to housetop and run away. They were to leave the city immediately by going to the city gates and flee to the mountains. It was a very serious situation. This was the window of opportunity for them to flee, when the Roman armies are retreating.

v18 - when they are in the fields, don't go back to the city. There is no time to gather anything but to flee away from the city into the mountains.

v17 and v18 is very similar to another historical incident in Jewish history when God rained judgement on Sodom and Gomorrah as recorded in book of Genesis. In the story, Lot and his wife and family were to flee the city.
Gen 19:17 tells us that they were not even allowed to look back but to escape to the mountains. Jesus, being a Jew, knew about this history of Lot and his wife, and He used this story as an example to the Jews as to how to do it.

In a parallel account to Mat 24:17-20, we find in Luke 17:28-32.

Luk 17:28  Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; 

Luk 17:29  But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. 

Luk 17:30  Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed. 

Luk 17:31  In that day, he which shall be upon the housetop, and his stuff in the house, let him not come down to take it away: and he that is in the field, let him likewise not return back. 

Luk 17:32  Remember Lot's wife. 

Jesus didn't have to tell them what happened to Lot's wife. He just said "remember her". They all knew what happened to her when she looked back and turned into a pillar of salt ! (an Aramaic idiom).
Jesus showed the correct interpretation of Lot and his wife, to remind the Jews, of the coming judgement and not to go back to Jerusalem, if not they will die.

Mat 24:19 if they are pregnant with a child or are carrying a baby, it is going to be difficult for them in fleeing. The journey will be difficult. The  terrain will be difficult. The running and walking will be difficult.

v20 - pray that it will not be in winter or on sabbath. This verse showed us that even Jesus did not know the exact time or exact day when the Day of Vengeance is going to happen. All that the Father God has shown to Jesus was that it is going to happen to that generation and it is very soon. He did not know whether it will happen in winter or summer, or on a Thursday or Friday. If it is in winter, it will be tougher on them, as the days will be short and the nights will be long.

As for the sabbath day, Christians are no longer bound under the Old Covenant of observing the sabbath day. That's why in Acts, we see the disciples did not observe the Sabbath day. For the Christians, Jesus is our sabbath. Jesus said that only the Father  knows the day or the hour.

Why did Jesus mentioned about praying that the Day will not be on sabbath day?
It could be that the Jews in Jerusalem are still very traditional Jews in practices. They were in a transition of following after Jesus Christ, and so some of their traditions have  not been completely dealt with. The rest of the Jews almost 99% of the population in the city still observe the sabbath very strictly but not the disciples of Jesus.
Another reason could be that on a sabbath day, the Jews have travel restrictions. Their previous rabbi only gave them 2000 steps to walk on a sabbath day, that is less than half a mile. If they truly observe this ritual, then they cannot reach the mountains. Also to enforce this rule, the city gate keepers actually close the gates on the sabbath day, and make it compulsory for Jews not to travel outside the  city.


Q: What will happen to them if they do not take heed to these warnings of Jesus to flee away to the mountains?
A: Luke 19:43-44 tells us that the enemy is  going to dig a trench around them and encompassed them, and they cannot get in or get out anymore. They will be surrounded by the invading armies.

That was the reason Josephus observed that the Christian Jews were fleeing the city of Jerusalem like people swimming away from a sinking ship.

HOW TO INTERPRET THE BIBLE


HOW TO INTERPRET THE BIBLE

By Charles S. Meek

I’ve had a lifelong interest in theology. Some things Christians believe are curious to me. For example, many conservative evangelical Christians, the group which I generally consider myself to be a part, proudly say, “We take the Bible literally.” Indeed, they use this statement as a test for orthodoxy. Well, here are few questions I’d like to ask them:

• When Jesus said that He is the vine (John 15:5), did He mean that He is a plant?

• Is God literally a rock (2 Samuel 22:3; Psalm 18:2, etc.)?

• Should we literally hate our mother and father so that we can be Jesus’ disciple (Luke 14:26)?

• If your eye causes you to sin, should you literally pluck it out (Mark 9:47)?

• Must we sell everything we have and give it to the poor in order to inherit eternal life (Luke 18:18-22)?

• Is it necessary to literally eat Christ’s body in order to have life (John 6:53)?

• Did the mountains and the hills really break into song and the trees clap their hands (Isaiah 55:12)?

• Is it literally true that serpents and scorpions cannot harm Christians (Luke 10:19)?

• Would the moon literally turn to blood before the Day of the Lord (Joel 2:31)?

• When God judged Babylon, an event in actual history, did the stars and sun literally stop giving their light (Isaiah 13:10) and the heavens literally tremble (Isaiah 13:13)? When God judged Edom did the sky literally roll up like a scroll (Isaiah 34:4)? When God judged Israel according to Micah 1:2-16, did the mountains literally melt and the valleys split? Read these passages and numerous others like them in the Bible (for example, Isaiah 24:23; Ezekiel 32:7; Amos 5:20; 8:9; Zephaniah 1:15) and then consider what you think of Matthew 24:29.


Some Christians may insist that, indeed, even these passages are to be understood “literally.” But certainly at least some of these are examples of how the Bible uses a variety of language techniques to describe real things in NON-literal language. Note that Jesus himself often used hyperbole, for example, to make important points.


I have a very conservative view of the Bible and believe that it is the inspired Word of God in its entirety—and that it communicates a literal sense even when it employs non-literal genres. But that does not mean that every word or phrase was meant to be taken in a wooden literal sense. The fact is that nobody is a consistent literalist, nor should anyone be!


In our everyday language, we use figures of speech so often that we do not even think about them. We sing metaphorically “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God.” We say things like “I could eat a horse,” “cat got your tongue,” “the four corners of the earth,” “the sky is falling,” “coming apart at the seams,” “he has a yellow streak down his back,” etc. We use hundreds of such idioms that are not literal, but people in our culture understand exactly what is meant.


The Bible too uses a variety of literary devices. It uses parables, poetry, hyperbole, allegories, metaphors, and many other figures of speech. In particular, it is common in the Bible to use astronomical language to describe important prophetic events. These events are often when God “came down” in judgment against the Jews or their enemies.


Hebraic terminology may be unfamiliar to us but was clearly understood by first-century Jews. Certain events prophesied in the Bible in Hebraic apocalyptic language we know for certain have already been fulfilled, such as God’s judgment upon Babylon.


Are there times when we should understand the Bible literally? Yes! But, should we really interpret the Bible “literally” in every instance? Of course not. It is more faithful to Scripture to interpret each passage the way it was INTENDED in its context and understood by its original audience.



Thursday, 7 May 2020

70 weeks - book of Daniel








70 weeks - book of Daniel


Almost all eschatology teachers, both true and false teachers will refer to the 70 weeks as mentioned in the book of Daniel. Right and wrong interpretation arise from right and wrong understanding of the 70 weeks.

In Dan 9:24 The angel Gabriel approaches Daniel in the latter half of the 9th chapter after Daniel prays for Israel. Gabriel mentions “seventy sevens” or "seventy periods of seven" (in some translations) will take place before God will put an end to sin and bring everlasting righteousness.

Dan 9:24  "Seventy weeks are decreed about your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place."



The A-Day-For-A-Year Principle

In order to understand this prophecy one must recognize the day-for-a-year principle. Critical to this understanding are these two texts: Numbers 14:34; and Ezekiel 4:6.

Num 14:34  According to the number of the days in which you spied out the land, forty days, a year for each day, you shall bear your iniquity forty years, and you shall know my displeasure.


Eze 4:6  And when you have completed these, you shall lie down a second time, but on your right side, and bear the punishment of the house of Judah. Forty days I assign you, a day for each year


Scholars agree that the sevens appears to mean years. Therefore, 70 X 7 = 490 years. Although Christians typically refer to the period of God bringing everlasting righteousness as 70 weeks, they really mean 70 X 7 years.



The 3 Parts of 70 weeks


The book of Daniel breaks down the 70 weeks (or 490 years) into 3 parts from verse 25 to 27.


1st Part = 7 weeks or 49 years

- 49 years (7 X 7): The time it takes to rebuild Jerusalem since the time the Babylonians had destroyed it (Daniel 9:25), which occurs in the Book of Nehemiah.

Dan 9:25  Know therefore and understand that from the going out of the word to restore and build Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one, a prince, there shall be seven weeks. Then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with squares and moat, but in a troubled time. 


2nd Part = 62 weeks or 434 years

- 434 years (62 X 7): A time designated for waiting for the Anointed One to come (Daniel 9:26). The Anointed One mean Jesus, here.

Dan 9:26  And after the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one shall be cut off and shall have nothing. And the people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war. Desolations are decreed. 


3rd Part = 1 week or 7 years

- 7 years (1 X 7): As recorded in Daniel 9:27. The 1st half of the 7 years i.e. the three and half years, deals with the ministry of Jesus until His death at the cross. After the death and sacrificial "Lamb of God" at the cross, the Temple sacrifices were no longer applicable. The 2nd half of the 7 years i.e. the second part of the three and half years, deals with the spreading of the kingdom of God to the whole inhabited world of the apostles.

Dan 9:27  And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator.



Matthew 24 in relation to Daniel 9

We shall look into these in more details. Looking at our key text again in Matthew 24.

Mat 24:15  Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand). 

Mat 24:16  Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains. 

We have already seen what is the abomination of desolation. Jesus said, when you see this in the holy place,... then take action to flee.


Q: What is the holy place to the Jews?

To the Jews, the holy place refers to their Temple and the surroundings. In fact, Jerusalem has often been called the holy city. It was the place of worship and meeting with God, because God does not meet with the Jews anywhere else.

In the Jew's historical account in the Apocrypha:

2Ma 2:18  As he promised in the law, will shortly have mercy upon us, and gather us together out of every land under heaven into the holy place: for he hath delivered us out of great troubles, and hath purified the place. 

The phrase holy place here refers to city of Jerusalem, because all the people from every land under heaven cannot go into the confined hall of the Temple. Physically, it is impossible, but they can assemble within the city walls because Jerusalem was their holy land or holy place.


According to Albert Barnes Commentary on Mat 24:15 on the holy place:

Standing in the holy place - Mark says, "standing where it ought not,” meaning the same thing. All Jerusalem was esteemed “holy,” Mat 4:5. The meaning of this is, when you see the Roman armies standing in the holy city or encamped around the temple, or the Roman ensigns or standards in the temple. Josephus relates that when the city was taken, the Romans brought their idols into the temple, and placed them over the eastern gate, and sacrificed to them there, “Jewish Wars,” b. 6 chapter 6, section 1.  ]


Jesus is warning His disciples, when you see the Abomination of Desolation in the "holy place" just like in Daniel - referring to Jerusalem and its Temple, then make haste to flee. (Matthew 24:15-16)



The Timing

Q: What did Daniel tells us about the Timing of the Abomination of Desolation?

Dan 9:25  Know therefore and understand, that from the going out of the command to restore and to build Jerusalem, to Messiah the Prince, shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks. The street shall be built again, and the wall, even in times of affliction. 

Dan 9:26  And after sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself. And the people of the ruler who shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. And the end of it shall be with the flood, and ruins are determined, until the end shall be war. 

Dan 9:27  And he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week. And in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the offering to cease, and on a corner of the altar desolating abominations, even until the end. And that which was decreed shall be poured on the desolator. 


verse 25 tells us there will be 2 periods of time. 7 weeks and 62 weeks, up to the appearance of the Messiah. Or in the Jewish's  interpretation it means 49 years and 434 years. Total = 483 years.


[Note: King Artaxerxes of Persia gave command to Ezra in Ezra 7:11-26, to rebuild Jerusalem in about 457BC. Some say it's around 458BC from what we know of Artaxerxes’ reign from outside historical sources.  This decree actually resulted in the rebuilding of Jerusalem under Nehemiah.
Why is this command to rebuild Jerusalem significant? It is because the Timing of the 70 weeks STARTS to tick, with the command to rebuild Jerusalem (verse 25), and Ezra and Nehemiah were instrumental to the rebuilding according to biblical history.


See: 



If we add 483 years to 457BC, it gives us = 27AD, since there is no 0AD.


verse 26 tells us that after the 483 years, the Messiah (meaning Jesus) will be cut off.

Around 27AD, Jesus has already revealed himself, and was moving around Israel, and subsequently was crucified.



verse 27 tells us that Jesus will confirm the covenant for the next 7 years. Within this 7 years, that is after the three and a half years, Jesus will cease the temple sacrifices. There is no more requirement for the sacrifices, since Jesus was the Lamb of God that was sacrificed for our sins once and for all for eternity.


The 1st Half of the 70th Week

Let us have some understanding of the first three and a half years.
Jesus began His ministry at the age 30 years:

Luk 3:23  And He, Jesus, when He began His ministry, was about thirty years old. 

Jesus ministry was for three and a half years as what church historians have concluded. They used many writings and extra-biblical history to confirm this. But basically by counting the number of Passover celebration as recorded, we would come to a similar three and a half years ministry of Jesus.

Also, for centuries, historians and church leaders believed that their Messiah was coming at the end of three and a half years to put an END to the Temple offerings. They understood Daniel 9:27.

v27 tells us that "sacrifices and offerings will cease ... even until the end." 


Temple Sacrifices and Offerings Ended

Heb 10:11-18 The book of Hebrews particularly written to the Jews, tells us that there were sacrifices and offerings by the priests, but now no more.

Heb 10:17  He adds, "AND THEIR SINS AND OFFENCES I WILL REMEMBER NO LONGER." 

Heb 10:18  But where these have been forgiven NO further offering for sin is required. 

Note: NO further offering for sin is required. Period. Any further Temple sacrifices and offerings are not acceptable anymore by God, whether there is a physical Temple building or not.


Jesus put an END to the sacrificial system (Old Covenant) at the Cross. Jesus successfully confirmed and enforced His covenant (New Covenant), and put an end to the sacrificial system in the middle of the 70th week.


Now, you can understand why Matthew 24 tells the audience at that generation to read and to understand Daniel regarding the Abomination of Desolation. It gives a clear timeline of events that must take place in Jerusalem in their generation, and spoken in the language and culture that they understood.





Listen to what a prominent theologian and bible scholar Ralph Woodrow wrote about this in his book "Great Prophecies of the Bible":

 This great prophecy pertaining to Daniel's people and the city of Jerusalem is linked with a time period of seventy "weeks." Bible students recognize that these seventy weeks or 490 days are symbolic of years—each day representing a year—that is, 490 years.


It was this same year-for-a-day principle that was used in Numbers 14:34. Because of unbelief, the Israelites were to wander for 40 years in the wilderness, a year for each day that the spies were absent searching out the land. This same scale was used in Ezekiel 4:4-6: "I have appointed thee a day for a year, a day for a year."

...From the going forth of the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem unto Messiah was to be 483 years....

Daniel's prophecy revealed that the time period unto the Messiah would be 69 weeks (483 years). This measured to the time when Jesus was baptized and anointed to begin his ministry as the Messiah, the Christ, the "Anointed One".

...HE SHALL CONFIRM THE COVENANT." When Jesus instituted the Lord's supper, representative of his shed blood for the remission of sins, he said: 'This is my blood of the new testament [covenant], which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (Mt. 26:28). The word "testament" here and the word "covenant" are translated from exactly the same word in the New Testament. "How much more shall the blood of Christ...purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament [covenant]" (Heb.9:14,15).

Jesus is called the "mediator of the new covenant" (Heb. 8:6), the "messenger of the covenant" (Mal. 3:1), and his shed blood is called "the blood of the everlasting covenant" (Heb. 12:24). Our Lord Jesus is the one who confirmed the covenant through his redemptive sacrifice at Calvary. And how beautifully this harmonizes with what we have already seen.


...HE SHALL CAUSE THE SACRIFICE AND THE OBLATION TO CEASE." This too was fulfilled in the death of Jesus Christ. In the Old Testament, as we have mentioned, sacrifices were repeatedly made. Each of these was but a mere type looking forward to the time when the perfect sacrifice, the Lamb of God, would be offered. Once this would be accomplished, God would no longer require or accept any other sacrifice.

The perfect sacrifice was Jesus Christ. The old system of repeated sacrifices (types) could only end at Calvary—when Christ became the perfect, eternal, and final sacrifice (See Heb. 9 and 10). In addition to Calvary's sacrifice, "there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins" (Heb. 10: 18, 26).

Eusebius, a Christian writer of the fourth century, pointed these things out: "Now the whole period of our Saviour's teachings and working of miracles is said to have been three-and-a-half years, which is half a week. John the evangelist, in his Gospel makes this clear to the attentive."

...Understanding this, we can now see real significance in certain New Testament statements which also speak of a definite established time at which Jesus would die. For example, we read: "They sought to take him: but no man laid hands on him, because his hour was not yet come" (John 7:30). In John 2:4, Jesus said, "Mine hour is not yet come." On another occasion, he said, "My time is not yet come" (John 7:6). Then just prior to his betrayal and death, he said, "My time is at hand" (Mt. 26:18), and finally, '"the hour is come" (John 17:1; Mt. 26:45).

These and other verses clearly show that there was a definite time in the plan of God when Jesus would die. He came to fulfill the scriptures, and there is only one Old Testament scripture which predicted the time of his death—the prophecy which stated that Messiah would be cut off in the midst of the 70th week—at the close of three and a half years of ministry! How perfectly the prophecy was fulfilled in Christ!  ]



The 2nd Half of the 70th Week

Q: What about the end of the 70th week? or the 2nd half of the 70th week? What does it tells us?

A: There are many interpretations of this, but I will show it from Jesus perspective with regard to the purpose and plan of God and the ushering of the New Covenant.

After the resurrection of Jesus, the disciples were told to take His kingdom from Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and unto the uttermost parts of the earth. This has always been the heart of God. He starts with Israel, but His plan is for the kingdom to the whole world, including our 21st Century world.

The book of Acts of the Apostles describes to us the adventures and history of what the apostles went through. It is a book on their "acts". We read in Acts chapter 1 - 7, that the gospel or good news of God's kingdom is mainly confined to Jerusalem and nearby region. Then the stoning of apostle Stephen happened in Acts 7.

Acts 7:51-56 tells us that Stephen preached to the religious Jews, and after that he literally saw Jesus standing in heaven.

After the stoning and death of Stephen by Saul (later called Paul), the persecution of the Christians continued and they had no choice but to go all over the world and scatter the seed of the Kingdom of God.

Act 8:1  And Saul fully approved of his murder. At this time a great persecution broke out against the Church in Jerusalem, and all except the Apostles were scattered throughout Judaea and Samaria. 



[  The stoning of Stephen was a turning point in the history of the early church:

Prior to that, the church functioned as part of Judaism, Christians lived practically as Jews and the church was confined to Jerusalem.

Through the persecution, which followed after his death, God dispersed the believers.  This reversed Jesus’s instruction to His followers to stay in Jerusalem (Acts 1:4).  The church was expelled from Judaism and Jerusalem.  The Christian message was taken to the Gentile world.  As was their habit previously, the fleeing believers at first took the message only to Jews (Acts 11:19).  But the Holy Spirit steered the gospel towards the non-Jews, particularly through the conversion of Paul; the apostle to the Gentiles.

The dating of Stephen’s death is entirely dependent on the date of Paul’s conversion.  Merrill C. Tenney, in his book “New Testament Times” (Inter-Varsity Press, 1967, chapter 7), gives 30 AD at the most probable year for the crucifixion and 32/33AD as the most probable date for the stoning of Stephen and the conversion of Paul.  R. Jewett (A Chronology of Paul’s Life (Philadelphia, 1979), pp. 1-2.) dates Paul’s conversion to 34AD.  Since this should at the most months after the stoning of Stephen, the Stoning of Stephen could be as late as 34AD.  Stephen therefore died about 2 to 4 years after the Cross.. ]


The persecution helped in the spreading of the gospel. Even Saul, the chief persecutor of the Christians, was converted and believed in Jesus Christ. Saul became Paul and took the gospel not just to the Jews but also to the Gentiles and the rest of the world.

Later on Paul wrote to the Galatians church that Jerusalem was in bondage with its children because they were acting like they were in bondage to the law under the Old Covenant.

Gal 4:25  This is Hagar; for the name Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, which is in bondage together with her children

From the time of the resurrection of Jesus (the end of the sacrifices and offerings) to the time of the stoning of Stephen is about three and a half years. This was the end of the 70th week. From then onwards, the scattering of the gospel to all over the world would go out like a flood until today.





Bonus:

This brings us to a fascinating point from the Gospels. When Peter asked Jesus how many times he had to forgive his brother, suggesting that seven times might be forgiving enough, Jesus replied that he should forgive seventy times seven, which is 490 times. Jesus was alluding to this prophecy from Daniel, and He was telling Peter to be as forgiving as God had been towards His wicked people (see Matthew 18:21).

Let's recap: Daniel heard the prophecy of 490 years of mercy being extended. He heard that the 490 years would start when the edict to rebuild Jerusalem went forth. After the edict was released and the clock started ticking, 483 years would go by, and then the Messiah would appear, which happened in AD27, when Jesus began His ministry. Then during the last seven years of the 490 years of mercy, the Messiah would end animal sacrifice, and He would also be put to death. This happened in AD30. Out of the 490 years, this timeline still leaves us with three and a half years left on the clock.

Approximately three and a half years after Jesus death and resurrection, Stephen was stoned to death, which was approved of by the chief ruler of the synagogue (see Acts 7:1, 54-60). This was the end of God's mercy clock for Jerusalem. Not long after, God gave Peter the vision of the unclean animals and sent him to evangelize Cornelius' house (see Acts 10), as well as converting Paul and sending him to the Gentiles (see Acts 9:1-5). This completed the 490 years of mercy God extended to His people. (From Jonathan Weston)


















UPDATED: 7 August 2021

Tuesday, 5 May 2020

The Abomination of Desolation (Part 2)


















The Abomination of Desolation (Part 2)

Mat 24:15  Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand). 

Mat 24:16  Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains. 


This is the keyword to the End Times. We read of Jesus referring to the "Abomination of Desolation" as described in the book of Daniel. So let's go to Daniel 9.

Dan 9:26  And after sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself. And the people of the ruler who shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. And the end of it shall be with the flood, and ruins are determined, until the end shall be war. 

Dan 9:27  And he (Messiah) shall confirm a covenant with many for one week. And in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the offering to cease, and on a corner of the altar desolating abominations, even until the end. And that which was decreed shall be poured on the desolator. 

In v27, we read of Daniel speaking about the "Abomination of Desolation". Also in v26, we know that Daniel was talking about the Messiah (i.e. Jesus Christ) and not the Antichrist as some may say.

The Messiah shall confirm the covenant. The word "confirm" speaks of "prevailing, strengthening". Jesus is going to prevail with a strong covenant.
On the Cross, Jesus death and resurrection was confirming the covenant. He got rid of the Old Covenant, and ushered in the New Covenant.

We read in Mat 26:28 that Jesus brought about the New Covenant by His precious blood.

Mat 26:28  For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. 













Dan 9:27 says Jesus will confirm the covenant with "many".. Who are the many? These  are those that have believed in Jesus and was ushered into the New Covenant by faith in Jesus Christ.

Historians tell us that many people, especially the believing Jews, believed in the words of Jesus and His warnings (Mat 24:16; Luk 21:21) about fleeing to the mountains. Not only those in the city of Jerusalem but including those in Judea, they are to flee. Those who fled were saved from the destruction.

Mat 24:16  Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains. 

Luk 21:20  And when you see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that its destruction has come. 

Luk 21:21  And let those in Judea flee to the mountains. And those in its midst, let them go out. And those in the open spaces, let them not go into her. 

See a write up about the fleeing to the mountains in wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_to_Pella

How did those in Judea knew when to flee? They were not in the city? They did not know what is happening at the Temple. Luk 21:20 give us the clue. They can see the Roman armies advancing towards the city. They can see the strategy of them surrounding all the walls of the whole city. When they saw, they remembered the warning of Jesus to flee to the mountains together with all the rest of the believers in Jerusalem because destruction is very near.

Sure enough, the Roman army desolated the city and the Temple, and set up the Roman god together with their emperor's image and the eagle crescent, and worshiped. This was recorded by several historians as a sad day for the Jews and the nation of Israel. In fact, the destruction was so extensive that the Jews did not have anymore daily sacrifices and all their traditional religious Judaism practices ceased.

Coming back to Mat 24:15-16 ...therefore when you "see" refers to those who were inside the city who saw the coming of the Roman armies. v6 tells us of "wars and rumors of wars", and in v15, the start of the war.

Check it out at the First Jewish Roman War:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Jewish-Roman_War

This was a specific answer to a specific question by Jesus disciples in Mat 24:3. The "Abomination of Desolation" is to be a major sign of the End of the Age and the coming of Jesus.


Here is what Albert Barnes (1798-1870) wrote in his commentary of the bible on page 254, regarding the "Abomination of Desolation".

[ Matthew 24:15 ‘The abomination of desolation – This is a Hebrew expression, meaning an abominable or hateful destroyer. The Gentiles were all held in abomination by the Jews, Act_10:28. The abomination of desolation means the Roman army, and is so explained by Luk_21:20. The Roman army is further called the “abomination” on account of the images of the emperor, and the eagles, carried in front of the legions, and regarded by the Romans with divine honors. ]

See a write up on Albert Barnes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Barnes_(theologian)


Another bible scholar Cecil Saunders in his book "The Future: An Amillennial Perspective: A Biblical Study of Things to Come" in 1990 wrote:

[  ..when reporting on the Olivet Prophecy, Luke did tell us who the "Abomination of Desolation" was. He said in Luke 21:20 "when you shall see Jerusalem encompassed by armies, then know the desolation is near. by reading the surrounding verses, one cannot deny that this is a parallel discourse of the Olivet prophecy in Matthew 24. Parallel accounts cannot have a different meaning. By combining Luke passage with secular history, it is clear that Titus and his armies is the "Abomination of Desolation". It was fulfilled in AD70 when the Romans desecrated and destroyed the Temple and Jerusalem. Matthew 24:15 and Luke 21"20 are parallel accounts speaking of the same event..]


The prophecy of Jesus was fulfilled about 35 years after He warned the disciples. Not only this warning about the "Abomination of Desolation" but all the prophecies in thie Olivet Discourse were fulfilled during that period leading to the End of the Age. Jesus was bringing in a new Age, the Age of the New Covenant.

As we have entered into this Age of the New Covenant, we will continue to :

a. experience the richness of God's grace, due to the kindness shown to us through Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:7).

b. be greater led by the Holy Spirit who has made his abode in us and treats us as  the Temple of the Living God.

c. learn and be taught by the Holy Spirit as we read and understand from the lessons in the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Sunday, 3 May 2020

The Abomination of Desolation (Part 1)




The Abomination of Desolation (Part 1)

Mat 24:15  Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand). 

Mat 24:16  Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains. 

Jesus direct His audience the meaning of "Abomination of Desolation" to His listeners. That is if they read about the "Abomination of Desolation" as written by Daniel, then they will understand the meaning.

In the book of Daniel, there are 3 passages that speak about the "Abomination of Desolation".

1. Dan 9:26 "...and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. "

2. Dan 11:31 "And forces will stand from him, and they will profane the sanctuary, the fortress, and shall remove the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the desolating abomination. "

3. Dan 12:11 "And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the desolating abomination set up..."


(See the understanding of Abomination of Desolation from a non-biblical perspective:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abomination_of_desolation )

The Jews recognized this phrase "Abomination of Desolation" to mean the destruction of their beloved Temple and their holy city of Jerusalem.

According to church historians, the Temple and Jerusalem experienced the "Abomination of Desolation" TWICE.

First time: the destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem AND the re-dedication of the Temple to Zeus by Antiochus IV Epiphanes in 167 BC.

Second time: the worship of the Roman Standards on the Temple Mount under Titus in 70 AD.

(Side note: church historians generally do not consider the building of the Dome of the Rock by the Umayyad Caliph Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan in 691 AD., as the "Abomination of Desolation".)

Church historians considered Dan 9:26, and Dan 11:31 as the Abomination of Desolation by Antiochus, the Syrian king. The reason is  that Daniel specifically mentioned that the event happened during the reign of the king Darius of Babylon. (Remember Daniel being a Jew was taken together with others to Babylon, when Jerusalem was attacked by the Babylonians. In Babylon, he refused the king's meat, and was fed to the lions.)

See write up on Darius:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_the_Mede

Church historians considered Dan 12:11 as the Abomination of Desolation by Titus and the Roman army. The reason is that Dan 12 was addressing the destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem, and the "people of the book" escaped the tribulation. In Dan 9 and Dan 11, the people did NOT escape, but all suffered the persecution and went into captivity in another country.

All the Jews know their Jewish history about the "Abomination of Desolation" by Antiochus, because of the oral and written traditions passed down from generation to generation. It is a sad and embarrassing event that happened in their past. The Jews at the time of Jesus Christ look at this event as a past prophecy, and not in their future.

Jesus being a Jew also, knew His audience can relate to this Abomination of Desolation by Antiochus, and draw their attention to it in the book of Daniel in Mat 24:15. He told them that it is a sign to their question in Mat 24:3. It is going to happen again as a sign of the End of the Age.

Let's look at some Jewish history that is found the "Apocrypha".
The Apocrypha is a set of writings which were earlier included in between the books of Malachi and Matthew. It covers chronologically events happening during the 400 year time gap between the time of writings of Malachi and Matthew.

A little knowledge on the Apocrypha.

Q: Why weren't the Apocrypha included in the bible?
A: When the different books or letters were put together to  form the bible, the council that was responsible for compiling the bible did not see the Apocrypha as necessary or divinely inspired. Yes, they were accurate historical data and actual written records of their times.

The Apocrypha are historically accurate and correct, but it does not mean that they are irrelevant. In fact, the Catholic bible includes the Apocrypha as part of their bible. The Orthodox Anglical Church includes them in their usage. Today it is possible to find Protestant Bibles which now include the Apocrypha. The original 1611 KJV contained the Apocrypha.

See a write up on Apocrypha:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_apocrypha

So let us regard the Apocrypha as Jewish history and not as divine scripture, we should be ok.

Apocrypha does talks about the history during the times of Daniel.

E.g. in 1 Maccabees 1:20-25, it talks about the reign of king Darius, king Antiochus, and the destruction of Jerusalem.

1Ma 1:1  And it happened, after that Alexander son of Philip, the Macedonian, who came out of the land of Chettiim, had smitten Darius king of the Persians and Medes, that he reigned in his stead, the first over Greece, 

1Ma 1:7  So Alexander reigned twelves years, and then died. 

1Ma 1:10  And there came out of them a wicked root Antiochus surnamed Epiphanes, son of Antiochus the king, who had been an hostage at Rome, and he reigned in the hundred and thirty and seventh year of the kingdom of the Greeks. 

Antiochus attacked Jerusalem in 168BC - 167BC.

1Ma 1:21  And (Antiochus) entered proudly into the sanctuary, and took away the golden altar, and the candlestick of light, and all the vessels thereof, 

1Ma 1:22  And the table of the shewbread, and the pouring vessels, and the vials. and the censers of gold, and the veil, and the crown, and the golden ornaments that were before the temple, all which he pulled off. 

1Ma 1:23  He took also the silver and the gold, and the precious vessels: also he took the hidden treasures which he found. 

1Ma 1:24  And when he had taken all away, he went into his own land, having made a great massacre, and spoken very proudly. 

1Ma 1:37  Thus they shed innocent blood on every side of the sanctuary, and defiled it: 

1Ma 1:54  Now the fifteenth day of the month Casleu, in the hundred forty and fifth year, they set up the abomination of desolation upon the altar, and builded idol altars throughout the cities of Juda on every side; 

1Ma 1:59  Now the five and twentieth day of the month they did sacrifice upon the idol altar, which was upon the altar of God. 

See the write up on Antiochus Epiphanus:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiochus_IV_Epiphanes





This was recorded in Jewish history in the Apocrypha.
Antiochus Epiphanus original name was Mithradates. When he became king, he took his father's name Antiochus, and added "Epiphanus" which in Syrian language means "the god made manifest" or "god manifest".

Antiochus set himself up as god. He sacrificed a pig on the brazen altar in the Temple, and he put up the idol Zeus (Greeks called it Zeus, but the Romans called it Jupiter) as the supreme god.


According to the Roman historian Flavius Josephus, he wrote of the similar event in his book "History of Jews volume 1: page 10 - 11" .
[... Antiochus put a stop to the daily Jewish sacrifice for three and a half years..]


See J.C. Sproul account of the Abomination of the Temple by Antiochus:
https://www.ligonier.org/learn/devotionals/abomination-temple/



Let's come back to Matthew 24, where we read that Jesus knew a similar situation was going to happen in Jerusalem within the generation of His disciples. Jesus knew of the history of the Syrian king Antiochus who attacked Jerusalem. He knew about the sacrifice of the pig on the altar. In fact, most of the Jews at that time knew about this.

Jesus referred to this event in Daniel's  "Abomination of Desolation", and say that another "Abomination of Desolation" is coming as a sign of the End of the Age.
Josephus wrote that this happened in AD66 - AD70 when the Roman armies attacked and destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple.


According to John L Bray who wrote the book "Matthew 24 fulfilled", he wrote about what the early historians like Josephus recorded:

[  .. these are some of the events that happened within that period, just before AD70. A wicked Jew went into the Temple and melted the holy vessels used in the Temple service. That the priests were killed including the high priest. Under the ruler Emperor Caligula, there was a non-priest who was  chosen to be the high priest over the Temple in Jerusalem and the daily sacrificial system was stopped just as it happened in Daniel's days. There would be open drunkenness inside the Temple. And prior to AD70, thousands of Jews would die at the hands of other Jews. And finally, the Roman army would break through from outside of Jerusalem to inside the city and destroyed the Temple, burning the Temple to the ground. These things happened prior to AD70. ]


Let us look at a parallel passage to Mat 24:15, in Luke 21:20.

Luk 21:20  And when you see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that its destruction has come. 

Jesus said when they see... Who see? The disciples see. Not us.
Then the destruction has come.

Daniel 12 speaks about the "Abomination of Desolation". Mat 24, Mark 13, Luke 21 speaks about the "Abomination of Desolation". There is going to be a repeat of the "Abomination of Desolation" by king Antiochus. And THEY WILL SEE it happened.

Jesus used Daniel as an example event because His audience can understand what He meant. The Desolation and Destruction will start with the armies surrounding Jerusalem. Why did the armies surround the city? They were going to destroy the city and its Temple, just as Jesus prophesied.


Let's look at another early theologian Joseph Ernest Renan's writing in 1899 in his "Renan's Antichrist". Here is  what he wrote concerning the Roman armies invading Jerusalem:

[.. the Romans planted their standards in the place where the Sanctuary stood and as was their custom offered them worship..].

See a write up on Joseph Renan:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Renan

He was writing about the desolation of the Temple. The Romans came into the Temple and  desolate it with their standards.


Q: Can it be that there is another "Abomination of Desolation" in our future? There is historical evidence that the "Abomination of Desolation" happened in the past, but what about the future.?

A: The "Abomination of Desolation" in Daniel was fulfilled by Antiochus.
The "Abomination of Desolation" in Jesus' prophecy was fulfilled by Titus and the Roman armies.
In both cases, the listeners were warned about the impending tribulation.
Nowhere was there another prophecy of the "Abomination of Desolation" after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. NOWHERE..!
Therefore, it is incorrect to take Mat 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, (which are fulfilled prophecy) to mean another happening in our future.

For example: You cannot take the prophecy and story of Noah and the flood, and say it is going to happen again in the future. You cannot say that even if you say "thus says the Lord". Wrong is wrong.

Note: In order for the "Abomination of Desolation" to happen again, there must be a physical Temple, a priesthood system and a daily sacrificial system. Today, there is none of these things in the world. There is no Temple, and there is no sacrifices.

Futurist (or dispensation teaching) says that Jesus will rebuild the Temple, and then the priesthood and the sacrifices will resume. This is totally wrong. The prophecy has already been fulfilled, and will not happen again, no 2nd, 3rd, or 4th time fulfillment.

It is important for us to understand that Jesus came, died and resurrected to deliver the Jews from that system when He declared that the End of that Age (End of that Order) came during that generation.
My question: Why are we putting aside the finished work of Jesus and going back to the Judaistic system.? God has already destroyed that system through the work of Jesus Christ. Why would God warn us about that coming system and the "Abomination of Desolation" again.?

The Judaistic system or Judaism has nothing to do with you and me today. Are you praying for a return of Judaism? Are you praying for a return of Roman armies to surround Jerusalem and destroy it and any future Temple again? Can we force the prophecy of Jesus meant for His disciples and make it to fit into our future timeline?
Don't be obsessed with Israel and the incorrect eschatology timeline.

Conclusion:
Ask yourself: Who was Jesus talking to? Who was the audience? Can we force our timeline into their timeline? Are we that generation that will see the destruction of Jerusalem?

Jesus was answering the disciples' question in Mat 24:3. It was for their generation, in their lifetime and in their era, not ours.

Matthew 24 was written TO the disciples and not TO us. But we can learn lessons from it because it is applicable FOR us. We should consider Mat 24 as fulfilled prophecy and take the infinite Kingdom of God to the whole planet and share the good news.

The church is now free and powerful to move into the limitless future to spread the Kingdom of God. We should spread the knowledge of the glory of the Lord to cover the whole earth as waters cover the sea. This is the job and purpose of the church Today.

Next post will be "Abomination of Desolation" (Part 2)

Saturday, 2 May 2020

Open the Seal - not the End yet.?














Open the Seal - not the End yet.?

Mat 24:15  Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand).

Mat 24:16  Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains. 


In Mat 24, we read of the phrase "Abomination of Desolation".
This term is CENTRAL to the interpretation of Eschatology or the study of End Times.

Some called it the "keystone" phrase. That means it holds all the eschatological teachings together just like in construction, the keystone keeps the elements in its place.

Matthew is asking his audience to "read this and understand it".
What is it to READ and UNDERSTAND.?
READ how Daniel the prophet speaks about the "Abomination of Desolation". UNDERSTANDS what it is about, and how to interpret it correctly.

The phrase "Abomination of Desolation" is NOT to be understood with our 21st Century relevance, but to be understood from the perspective of Daniel the prophet in the book of Daniel.

Q: Why did Jesus referred to the book of Daniel?
A: It is because in Daniel, there were written visions and prophecies that were sealed up, and nobody can understand them. They are to be closed, and hidden from the people. It is not to be discussed or talked about, because God told Daniel to sealed it up, and don't bring it up.

Dan 12:1  And at that time Michael shall stand up, the great ruler who stands for the sons of your people. And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation; until that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. 

In Daniel 12:1, we read of the angel Michael witnessing a great event of troubles coming upon the nation. But the people whose names are written in the book will be delivered.

From first reading, it seems that God was talking about the Jewish people, but the key understanding is "people whose names are written in the book".

How to understand this "people of the book".?
See Rev 5:9 (other verses that talks about who are those whose names are written in the book of life = Rev 3:5; 13:8; 17:8; 20:15 etc.)

Rev 5:9  And they sang a new song, saying, You are worthy to take the book and to open its seals, for You were slain and have redeemed us to God by Your blood out of every kindred and tongue and people and nation. 

The "people of the book" refers to those who have been redeemed to God by the blood of Jesus,! It is NOT talking about the Jewish people or Israel as a nation, but a people who have been redeemed by Jesus.

Revelations was talking about Christians and His church.

So Jesus is referring to Daniel's prophecy, where in the midst of great troubles, His people, those redeemed by His blood, will be delivered from the troubles. Jesus was not referring to any of our future events of great tribulation, where His people are going to be delivered from the troubles. Jesus was talking to His disciples at their moment in time, and in their generation, not ours.

Look at Dan 12:2-4

Dan 12:2  And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. 

Dan 12:3  And those who are wise shall shine as the brightness of the sky; and those who turn many to righteousness shall shine as the stars forever and ever. 

Dan 12:4  But you, O Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, even to the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased. 

Daniel was told by Michael to shut up the words and seal the book. Do not open it yet, because it is not the time yet. Seal it up to the time of the End.

What was Jesus talking about in Mat 24:15?
Jesus was answering the disciples' question about when the End of the Age will take place. So Jesus gave them the sign of the "Abomination of Desolation" that is going to take place as according to what Daniel prophesied. This sign was going to take place in their generation. The "seal" that was closed in Daniel, is going to be "open".
So when they read this in Daniel, they should understand it is coming in their time.

Let's  see another place in Daniel:

Dan 12:8  And I heard, but I did not understand. Then I said, O my lord, what shall be the end of these things? 

Dan 12:9  And He said, Go, Daniel! For the words are closed up and sealed until the end-time. 

Compare  this with Rev 5:1-9, where John wrote about Jesus was worthy to open the seal of the book because He has redeemed us by His blood.

Rev 5:9  was referring to Jesus and His blood that redeemed us.
John wrote about Jesus and only Jesus was able to open the seal of the book.
In Mat 24:15, Jesus was in that process of unsealing the book that Daniel prophesied about.

Daniel lived about 400 - 500 years before Jesus. His book was sealed until the coming of Christ who came to unseal the seal of the book. It happened because of the blood of Jesus that was shed at the Cross.

When John wrote Rev 22:10, he is saying it is happening very soon. Do not seal the book anymore. Do not close it anymore.

Rev 22:10  And he said to me, Do not seal the Words of the prophecy of this Book; for the TIME IS AT HAND. 

Why? Because the "time is at hand". It is almost time. It is happening very very soon.

Time is at hand does not mean 21st Century or 2000 years later. It means their generation, their time line, their time-clock, their moment in time.

What does that tell you about Mat 24 and Rev 22? They are speaking of the same event, and the same timeline, before the End of the Age in AD70. So, the book of Revelations is written before AD70.


Revelations is not about our future event about to happen.
If you want to interpret Revelations, it must be interpreted in according to Matthew 24, and Daniel 12, because Jesus talked about "Abomination of Desolation" in Mat 24:15, and refer it to Dan 12:1, and "people whose names are in the book" in Dan 12:1 refers to "people whose names are in the book" in Revelations..!!

Revelations cannot be speaking about a new Temple that is going to be destroyed in the "Abomination of Desolation". In fact, book of Revelations does NOT say anything about Jews rebuilding a new Temple. People just assume it because there is the word "temple" in Revelations. Revelations has NO mention of "Antichrist", NO mention of "one world government", NO mention of "micro-chips" or "debit card". All these are presumptions to fit into a futuristic view (or dispensation theology), that evolved about 200 years ago in America.!

Q: How would you react to a teaching that says that we need to build an ark, and put all the animals inside it, two by two, because a flood is coming just as in the days of Noah? The preacher will even tell you, it is stated in the bible.

A: You will not accept it and called it wrong teaching or wrong prophecy. Why Because, the flood and its warning already happened in the time of Noah. It already took placed. The prophecy was already fulfilled. The warning was for that generation at that timeline and the flood already took place. Even though the preacher uses scripture, but he used it incorrectly.!

Note: Similarly, don't expect a repeat of fulfilled prophecy, because what Jesus prophesied about the "Abomination of Desolation" already happened at the timeline of the audience that He was talking to.

Just because it is in the bible, or scripture, don't assume that God is going to fulfilled it a 2nd, 3rd or a 4th time. It is bad assumption, and bad interpretation.
This is the cause of many confusions, cults, and denominations, where people are just taking verses from the old testament, and say God is doing it again. No audience relevance. No Context. No historical relevance.

To share a personal experience in this:

Many years ago, I was attending a charismatic church on an island, and the church was going through some problems. The preacher took the prophecy given to Joshua, and asked the congregation to march around the church everyday, and on the 7th day, to march 7 times, and then blow the musical instruments, just like what was instructed in Joshua 6. Guess what? The "walls" did not fall down, and the church still remains as it is. The instruction was specifically given to Joshua, and Joshua obeyed and the event happened as God said it would.
It is very dangerous to believe someone who says that "God spoke to me" and asked him to fulfill the same prophecy again.


Q: Why did Daniel use the phrase "Abomination of Desolation".? Is it something that all the Jews understand? Has it been used before to represent any particular event that Israel can identify?

Answer:
Actually, Daniel did not just use the phrase "Abomination of Desolation" in 1 place in the book of Daniel. He use it in 3 places in Dan 9:27; 11:31; 12:11.

The Jews understand this term "Abomination of Desolation" very well indeed. It fact, it shocked the whole nation of Israel during the Abomination of Desolation. To understand this, we need to look at writing of historians, and realized that the Jews understood that the "Abomination of Desolation" referred to the destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem. According to Jewish history, in December 168BC, the Syrian king Antiochus Epiphanes, on his destruction of Jerusalem, sacrificed a pig on the altar of the Temple, and erected an idol representing their god Zeus. This was the Abomination of Desolation. It was to mock the God of Israel. Daniel wrote about this event as it was happening.

Jesus took this Daniel's event of "Abomination of Desolation", and said His disciples are going to see it. Jesus took that event that happened during Daniel's time and prophesied a similar event in their lifetime, and in their generation, as a sign of the End of the Age.


See a write up on Daniel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_(biblical_figure)

See a write up on Antiochus Epiphanes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiochus_IV_Epiphanes

See a write up on Abomination of Desolation:
https://preteristarchives.org/matthew-2415-study-archive/