Monday, 19 April 2021

Faithful servant and evil servant


 









Faithful servant and evil servant

This parable of the faithful servant and evil servant is found in Matthew 24:45-51

Mat 24:45  “Who then is the faithful and wise servant, whom his master has set over his household, to give them their food at the proper time? 

Mat 24:46  Blessed is that servant whom his master will find so doing when he comes. 

Mat 24:47  Truly, I say to you, he will set him over all his possessions. 

Mat 24:48  But if that wicked servant says to himself, ‘My master is delayed,’ 

Mat 24:49  and begins to beat his fellow servants and eats and drinks with drunkards, 

Mat 24:50  the master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know 

Mat 24:51  and will cut him in pieces and put him with the hypocrites. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 


It should be noted that this parable is not a stand-alone parable, and to be interpreted indiscriminately according to the likes of the preacher, but this parable is part of the Context of Matthew 24, where Jesus was explaining about the events that must take place during their last days before the destruction of Jerusalem in AD70.

If you were to just read the parable, it does seem slightly extreme, but if you take it as part of the answer to the disciples' questions in Matthew 24:3, then you will be able to comprehend it within its Context, its Audience Relevance, and Historical Relevance.


Preceding Context.

What was the preceding Context of this parable? You will read in verse 36-44, that Jesus speaks about no one knowing the hour, about the Day of the Lord, and it will be coming at an unexpected time or hour.

Considering this train of thought and Context, Jesus then launch into this parable of the faithful servant and the evil servant.


Contrast

In this parable, Jesus brings a huge distinct contrast between the faithful servant and the evil servant. 

It is a contrast between those who heeded his warnings and those that did not heed his warnings. 

It is a contrast between those who were ready, and those who were not ready.

The contrast showed that the faithful servant was expecting, and doing was instructed, when the master arrived back. The evil servant was not expecting, and not doing what was instructed, when the master arrived back.

The evil servant said the master was delayed, so he did not considered the consequence of his actions and turned on other servants and beat them.


This parable is a representation of 2 different groups of people, who have 2 different responses to the same circumstances, even though they were all servants of the same master.


Then the master arrived, but he did not do anything to the faithful servant. The master left him alone. But he cut into pieces the evil servant.

What was Jesus implying? What was Jesus interpreting? What did he meant?

Jesus is telling the story for his immediate audience at that time (audience relevance).

The Jews were the servant of God (in this parable, the servant of the master). 

The faithful servant represents Jesus disciples, those who believed in him and the church at that time. They were busy doing the master's business, busy taking God's message to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and outer regions. They were bringing the kingdom of God everywhere, and healing the people. There were busy spreading the good news of Jesus.

The evil servant represents the other Jews who mocked the Jewish believers of Jesus. They turn around and beat their Jewish brethren, stoning them (e.g. Stephen), crucifying them, and killing them. They turned on their own kind, their own people, the Jews.

When Jesus (the master) showed up, He is going to go against the evil servant.

Note: Jesus is not in the work of removing or taking out the faithful servant. Jesus did not "rapture" out the believers, but he came to deal with the evil servant only.


The evil servant was not watching for the arrival of the master, as compared to the faithful servant who had his eyes expectedly on the master.

The faithful servant on the other hand, was anticipating with hope for the  master's arrival, even though they did not know the hour as well.


Peter added clarity to the parable

Historically, the Judaistic Jews persecuted the Christian Jews prior to the fall of Jerusalem and the Temple in AD70, when the Roman armies besieged Jerusalem. The  persecution began with mocking, stoning, imprisonment etc.

Peter, as part of the audience receiving this parable story from Jesus about the faithful servant and evil servant, began to write about this in 2 Peter 3:1-4.

2Pe 3:1  This is now the second letter that I am writing to you, beloved. In both of them I am stirring up your sincere mind by way of reminder, 

2Pe 3:2  that you should remember the predictions of the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior through your apostles, 

2Pe 3:3  knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. 

2Pe 3:4  They will say, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” 



See the connection here, Peter is telling the same meaning with more descriptive  words.

In verse 3, Peter was speaking to them of the coming of their last days of the Mosaic Age (their Old Covenant system). The Old Covenant was fading away.

The scoffers will be so ignorant of the warnings of Jesus. They said that everything was the same as before, so why bother.

Peter is reminding them so that they can remember (verse 1-2), because Peter remembers Jesus warning about the master's returning.


Paul gave a similar description in 1 Thessalonians 5:1-9

1Th 5:1  Now concerning the times and the seasons, brothers, you have no need to have anything written to you. 

1Th 5:2  For you yourselves are fully aware that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 

1Th 5:3  While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. 

1Th 5:4  But you are not in darkness, brothers, for that day to surprise you like a thief. 

1Th 5:5  For you are all children of light, children of the day. We are not of the night or of the darkness. 

1Th 5:6  So then let us not sleep, as others do, but let us keep awake and be sober. 

1Th 5:7  For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, are drunk at night. 

1Th 5:8  But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, having put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation.
 
1Th 5:9  For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 


Paul here is describing the difference in a different way about those in the light and those in darkness.

Adam Clarke (1762-1832), a reputable bible theologian, wrote a commentary on the bible which took him 40 years to complete. This commentary became the primary Methodist theological resource for two centuries.

Regarding 1 Thes 5:9, he wrote:

[.. For God hath not appointed us to wrath - So then it appears that some were appointed to wrath, to punishment; on this subject there can be no dispute. But who are they? When did this appointment take place? And for what cause? These are supposed to be “very difficult questions, and such as cannot receive a satisfactory answer; and the whole must be referred to the sovereignty of God.” If we look carefully at the apostle’s words, we shall find all these difficulties vanish. It is very obvious that, in the preceding verses, the apostle refers simply to the destruction of the Jewish polity, and to the terrible judgments which were about to fall on the Jews as a nation; therefore, they are the people who were appointed to wrath; and they were thus appointed, not from eternity, nor from any indefinite or remote time, but from that time in which they utterly rejected the offers of salvation made to them by Jesus Christ and his apostles; ]


In John Bray's book "Matthew 24 fulfilled", John quoted a famous theologian Dr. Milton Terry in his 1898 book "Biblical Apocalyptics - A study of the Most Notable revelations of God and of Christ in the canonical scriptures". 

He quote:

[..Finally it is important to observe that the preterist and historical method of interpretation followed in this  volume conserves the substance of every fundamental doctrine of the gospel of Christ. It may helpfully modify some current conceptions of "the Great and Notable day of the Lord", for it treats the imagery of collapsing skies, and falling stars, and sounding trumpets, and dissolving mountains, and great white throne, and scores of similar figures of thought as expressing great realities, but not spectacular physical phenomena.

Our interpretation no more denies or sets aside the doctrines of eternal judgement, of heaven and hell, of resurrection of the dead, and the coming and kingdom of Christ than does the refusal to affirm the literal "fire and brimstone" the future retribution deny or invalidate the doctrine of eternal reward and punishment beyond this  mortal life.

Nearly 19 centuries of the manifested power and glory of Christianity in the world ought to have thrown some light on the nature of the coming and the kingdom of Christ. It can scarcely be a question among intelligent believers in Christ that the beginning of the era of our Lord and Savior was the most signal and significant epoch in the history of mankind. It marked a "fullness of times", a crisis of Ages.

The exact point of transition from the old to the new maybe with many an open question. But whether we placed it at the birth of Jesus or at the time of his crucifixion when he cried "it is finished", or at his  resurrection, or at his ascension, or at Pentecost, or at the fall of Jerusalem, the great commanding fact is still before us, that the manifestation of the Christ with which all those events must ever appear in vital relation, opened a new era in human civilization.

We now submit the thought that these 19 centuries of Christian light and progress are relatively but the misty morning twilight of the great day of Christ. It may be that he must reign a thousand times a thousand years before he shall have put all his enemies under his feet. 1 Corinthians 15:25.

The Coming of Christ in his kingdom and power and glory is not one instantaneous act or event. It is a long continuing process comprehensive of his entire work both of redemption and of judgement.

He comes in the power of his spirit to convict the world respecting sin and righteousness and judgement. John 16:8

He comes in light manner to forgive the sins of the penitent and to lead the disciple into all the truth. He comes and is present wherever 2 or 3 gathered together in his name.

He has been coming through all the Christian centuries to receive unto himself the faithful souls who have looked for his heavenly appearing in glory. John 14:3; 7:22-24.

As truly as Jehovah come of old in clouds of heaven to execute judgement on the Egyptians, so did the Son of Man come in the clouds with the angels of his power to execute judgement on the great city that was guilty of his blood and drunk with the blood of his saints and martyrs.

He sits at the right hand of power and sends forth continually his innumerable company of angels to minister for them that shall inherit salvation. Such triumphal administration of judgement, mercy and truth has been, is now and shall for ages, be the work of his Messianic reign.
And in full accord with these revelations of his power and glory, we cry out with the Hebrew psalmist,

"The Lord cometh, He cometh to judge the earth.
He shall judge the world with righteousness and peoples with his truth"

And we also respond with the Christian apocalyptist, Amen. Come Lord Jesus.  ]


Tuesday, 13 April 2021

Timeline of written Translation History


 












Timeline of written Translation History

1,400 BC: The first written Word of God: The Ten Commandments delivered to Moses.


500 BC: Completion of All Original Hebrew Manuscripts which make up The 39 Books of the Old Testament.


200 BC: Completion of the Septuagint Greek Manuscripts which contain The 39 Old Testament Books AND 14 Apocrypha Books.


1st Century AD: Completion of All Original Greek Manuscripts which make up The 27 books of the New Testament.


315 AD: Athenasius, the Bishop of Alexandria, identifies the 27 books of the New Testament which are today recognized as the canon of scripture.


382 AD: Jerome's Latin Vulgate Manuscripts Produced which contain All 80 Books (39 Old Test. + 14 Apocrypha + 27 New Text).


500 AD: Scriptures have been Translated into Over 500 Languages.


600 AD: LATIN was the Only Language Allowed for Scripture.


995 AD: Anglo-Saxon (Early Roots of English Language) Translations of The New Testament Produced.


1384 AD: Wycliffe is the First Person to Produce a (Hand-Written) manuscript Copy of the Complete Bible; All 80 Books.


1455 AD: Gutenberg Invents the Printing Press; Books May Now be mass-Produced Instead of Individually Hand-Written. The First Book Ever Printed is Gutenberg's Bible in Latin.


1516 AD: Erasmus Produces a Greek/Latin Parallel New Testament.


1522 AD: Martin Luther's German New Testament.


1526 AD: William Tyndale's New Testament; The First New Testament printed in the English Language.


1535 AD: Myles Coverdale's Bible; The First Complete Bible printed in the English Language (80 Books: O.T. & N.T. & Apocrypha).


1537 AD: Tyndale-Matthews Bible; The Second Complete Bible printed in English. Done by John "Thomas Matthew" Rogers (80 Books).


1539 AD: The "Great Bible" Printed; The First English Language Bible Authorized for Public Use (80 Books).


1560 AD: The Geneva Bible Printed; The First English Language Bible to add Numbered Verses to Each Chapter (80 Books).


1568 AD: The Bishops Bible Printed; The Bible of which the King James was a Revision (80 Books).


1609 AD: The Douay Old Testament is added to the Rheims New Testament (of 1582) Making the First Complete English Catholic Bible; Translated from the Latin Vulgate (80 Books).


1611 AD: The King James Bible Printed; Originally with All 80 Books. The Apocrypha was Officially Removed in 1885 Leaving Only 66 Books.


1782 AD: Robert Aitken's Bible; The First English Language Bible (KJV) Printed in America.


1791 AD: Isaac Collins and Isaiah Thomas Respectively Produce the First Family Bible and First Illustrated Bible Printed in America. Both were King James Versions, with All 80 Books.


1808 AD: Jane Aitken's Bible (Daughter of Robert Aitken); The First Bible to be Printed by a Woman.


1833 AD: Noah Webster's Bible; After Producing his Famous Dictionary, Webster Printed his Own Revision of the King James Bible.


1841 AD: English Hexapla New Testament; an Early Textual Comparison showing the Greek and 6 Famous English Translations in Parallel Columns.


1846 AD: The Illuminated Bible; The Most Lavishly Illustrated Bible printed in America. A King James Version, with All 80 Books.


1885 AD: The "English Revised Version" Bible; The First Major English Revision of the KJV.


1901 AD: The "American Standard Version"; The First Major American Revision of the KJV.


1971 AD: The "New American Standard Bible" (NASB) is Published as a "Modern and Accurate Word for Word English Translation" of the Bible.


1973 AD: The "New International Version" (NIV) is Published as a "Modern and Accurate Phrase for Phrase English Translation" of the Bible.


1982 AD: The "New King James Version" (NKJV) is Published as a "Modern English Version Maintaining the Original Style of the King James."
 

2002 AD: The English Standard Version (ESV) is Published as a translation to bridge the gap between the accuracy of the NASB and the readability of the NIV.


(from the web)



My Questions:


1. Why was the written bible books translated and changed so many times (in the western languages)? Who decided on the change?


2. If there was a need for human hands to change "the Word of God", does that mean that the previous versions, or previous books, or previous translations are NOT the Word of God?


3. Why is there a modern need to stick to KJV translation, when many research articles have stated that there were thousands (one even put it as 100,000) of changes to the original work that was ordered by King James of Britain?


4. Is the actual word for word verbatim more important or is it that the general message of the bible books (66 books or 80 books, depending of which denom you are from) is more important?


5. Where is the harmony of all these translations and bible books? Do you know that there are more than 30,000 denominations (separatist groups or some may call them cults), that stemmed out of the assumption that their translation is more correct, or their verses are more important.?


6. Who determines that there should be 66 books or 80 books in the modern bible book? Shouldn't importance be granted to the other books that were left out of the 66, especially some of them are written by early church leaders, and some are historical recorded facts in essence?


Many more questions to come. This is to provoke your thinking cap instead of blind herd mentality syndrome.


ps:

1. I have not even gone into the other languages translated out into their mother tongues. Then the list of bible translations will be too overwhelming long. Some of their bible versions were translated from error sources and wrong translations.


2. For example, the Chinese bible used today was translated from the KJV English bible that has numerous errors. It is only wise that even the Chinese readers study the original text in their Greek or Hebrew, to understand the extent of these errors. Also the Taiping bible printed in China cannot be trusted because part of the text was rewritten to suit the overthrow of the China's emperor then, to gain political power and control.


3. Some years ago, I was under the tutelage of a Kiwi missionary in New Zealand. He told me that in one area of his mission, there was no translated version of the bible for their language, and as a result, they had to translate the New Testament for them to understand. However, these people never knew what sheep is, and how they look like or behave. So in order to make them understand, they replaced the word "sheep" with "pigs", which is their most prized possession.... hahaha..

Imagine us reading that "Jesus came for the lost pigs of Israel".



Saturday, 10 April 2021

Remember Lot's wife (Luke 17:32)
















Remember Lot's wife (Luke 17:32)

This phrase "remember Lot's wife" is not found in Matthew 24 but in a parallel passage of bible text in Luke 17.

To understand this phrase, we need to understand the verses that are surrounding this phrase, and that is about the "days of Noah".

The background or pre-text of this phrase is about the "days of Noah".

Mat 24:37  For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 

Mat 24:38  For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 

Mat 24:39  and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 

Mat 24:40  Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left. 

Mat 24:41  Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left. 

Mat 24:42  Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. 


See also Luke 17:26-32.

Luk 17:26  Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man. 

Luk 17:27  They were eating and drinking and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. 

Luk 17:28  Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot—they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, 

Luk 17:29  but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all,

Luk 17:30  so will it be on the day when the Son of Man is revealed. 

Luk 17:31  On that day, let the one who is on the housetop, with his goods in the house, not come down to take them away, and likewise let the one who is in the field not turn back. 

Luk 17:32  Remember Lot's wife. 



The context of "days of Noah" is still within the conversation of Jesus about the destruction of Jerusalem. Jesus has not changed topic in the midst of His conversation with His disciples. Jesus was not switching timeline and meant it to be a future event of a few thousand years to come. Jesus is still in the timeline of "this generation shall not pass away", and this generation shall witness all these events. Nothing has changed in terms of timeline, audience and context.

Jesus used a comparison of the "days of Lot" with the "days of Noah".

In the "days of Lot", God led Lot and his family away from the destruction that came upon Sodom and Gomorrah.

In the "days of Noah", God led Noah and his family away from the flood that came and swept everyone away.

This was the example of Jesus to his audience that God will lead them away from the destruction that is coming upon Jerusalem in AD70.

Note: Some futurists interpret these "days of Lot and Noah" as examples of a future event when Jesus will come again a second time and take everyone away. That is wrong interpretation. Firstly, it is not about a future event that is going to happen. Secondly, God did not take Lot and Noah out of the world that they lived in. God led them out of the destruction, but not out of the world.

In fact, Jesus prayed to the Father, that His disciples will NOT be taken away or out of the world.

Joh 17:15  I do not ask that you take them out of the world, but that you keep them from the evil one. 

Jesus is preparing them that just like the flood that took all away, so it shall be on that day.

In the days of Noah, they were living normal lives, eating, drinking, marrying, given in marriage etc.

It doesn't mean that they were in debauchery (excessive indulgence in sex, alcohol, and other bodily pleasures).


Wrong contemporary teaching.

Some bible teachers say that in our future, just like during the days of Noah and Lot, the people will be in excessive indulgence, and then Jesus will suddenly come and take the believers away. They interpret it as a sign of the timing of the Second Coming of Jesus in the future.

But Jesus never meant it that way in Matthew 24 and Luke 17.

Jesus meant that the people at the times of Noah and Lot were just living normal lives that's all. Normal in their routine of  eating, drinking, raising their families etc. The people who perished had no apprehension (anxiety or fear that something bad is going to happen) that they knew of a flood or destruction that was coming soon.


Consider this issue of marriage (Matthew 24:38; Luke 17:27).

Before the flood and destruction came upon the people, they were having marriage plans. They were not expecting any disaster coming.
However, Paul dealt with this issue of marriage in view of the coming destruction of Jerusalem.


1Co 7:25  Now concerning the betrothed, I have no command from the Lord, but I give my judgment as one who by the Lord's mercy is trustworthy. 

1Co 7:26  I think that in view of the present distress it is good for a person to remain as he is. 


Paul suggested to those who were about to get married,  not to marry, because of the "present distress".

Why? What was the "present distress"?

Paul was speaking to the believers that were undergoing persecution. They were about to be invaded by the Roman army, and the destruction upon their beloved city Jerusalem was imminent, so in view of that, it is better to put off getting married. (Compare this with what Jesus said about the rest of the others who were indifferent, and were marrying and giving into marriage).

Paul continued in 1 Corinthians 7:27-28

1Co 7:27  Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be free. Are you free from a wife? Do not seek a wife. 

1Co 7:28  But if you do marry, you have not sinned, and if a betrothed woman marries, she has not sinned. Yet those who marry will have worldly troubles, and I would spare you that. 


Paul was referring to their particular dangerous circumstances. Paul was not saying generally that marriage is not good.

Their current situation is so stressful that there is going to be lots of trouble in their physical world, and they might lose their spouse or love ones that were caught up in the coming destruction.


1Co 7:29  This is what I mean, brothers: the appointed time has grown very short. From now on, let those who have wives live as though they had none, 

Verse 29 says that "the time is short". There is coming a particular day of great tribulation and disaster, and that event is coming very soon.


1Co 7:30  and those who mourn as though they were not mourning, and those who rejoice as though they were not rejoicing, and those who buy as though they had no goods, 

Verse 30 is preparing them to take heed that there are more important issues at hand as compared to marriage plans. These issues will result in their salvation from the wrath that is coming upon the Jews.


1Co 7:31  and those who deal with the world as though they had no dealings with it. For the present form of this world is passing away. 

Verse 31 says "the present form of this world is passing away". That means their way of life is coming to an end. It is going to be hard on them. Paul is discouraging the unmarried Jews to stay unmarried to spare them of the difficult hardship.


So when you read 1 Corinthians 7:25-31, you will see that it is in line with what Jesus meant about people getting married in Matthew 24:39.
Jesus and Paul is not against getting married, but discourages it because they have so little time left till the destruction. The judgement is coming very soon and they will go through a very present distress.


The future disappearing act?

Futurists and dispensationalists teach that there will be a last days coming and there will be a rapture as according to Matthew 24:40-42.

They claim that in the future "last days" that is coming, one will be taken, and the other left. One will be gone, and the other is still working.

They have even produced very dramatic disaster-themed movies that show how some pilots will disappear, and then the planes will nosedive into disastrous results. Parents will disappear. Important people will disappear, and then worldwide disaster will take place. They claimed that this judgement is going to happen to planet earth.

Futurists and dispensationalists have always through the past years been proven wrong. They are using scriptures to wrongly fit into their wrong theology. Sad, that the modern religious churches have followed onto this wrong path. They preached that 50% of the people are going to die because of this rapture. This is called taking the verses out of Context, and misunderstanding the historical timeline.

Also, Jesus was referring to the last days of the Jews before the destruction of Jerusalem, and not referring to our  future event of a great judgement to come. Jesus did not speak to an audience and warned them of a great tribulation that will not happen during their time. What is the point? They will be long dead by then. This is called wrong interpretation with regards to audience relevance.


Now, let's consider the "days of Lot". This is found in the parallel passage of Luke 17:28, and not in Matthew.

Right after Jesus spoke about the "days of Noah" in verse 27, He spoke about the "days of Lot" in verse 28.

Luk 17:28  Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot—they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, 

Luk 17:29  but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all.

Verse 28 and 29 is related to the coming of the Son of Man in judgement on Jerusalem.


Rapture? What rapture?

In the story of Noah and the flood, and the story of Lot and Sodom, you will notice that Noah and Lot were not raptured away out of this world, prior to the judgements. Righteous Lot was encouraged to leave the city prior to its judgement. Lot got out, but Lot's sons-in-laws, stayed behind (See Genesis 19:14), and died in the judgement.

Similarly, when Jesus told His disciples about the coming judgement that took place in AD70, He was not promising them about rapturing them out, but instead they should flee the city, and flee the judgement. See Matthew 24:17; Mark 13:15 and Luke 17:31.


Remember Lot's wife

However, this phrase "remember Lot's wife" is only found in Luke 17:32, and not in Matthew or Mark.

Qn: Why this phrase "remember Lot's wife"? What is the significance?

Some motivators have used this verse to instill vision and motion in people to move forward and not look backwards. However, Jesus did not meant this verse to be used in this way.

An: This verse should be interpreted in its historical context. When Lot's wife looked back, she didn't really want to leave the city. As a result she died. That's it. Not any deep meaning into it.

So Jesus said it to His disciples, as a warning to them, not to us, but to that generation of believers, that they should not linger but flee. They should not delay like Lot's wife and died. So when the destruction begin, don't drag their feet and delay or put off fleeing. Just get out of there. Don't look back and don't leave their heart or mind behind.


This verse should be read just as it is and not spiritualized into a motivation message.


A spiritualized meaning of "remember Lot's wife"

However, if you want to spiritualize the verse Luke 17:32, then it should be, that our heart should be cut off from the Mosaic system, and don't let your heart go back to that old covenant. Don't ever consider it and look back, because that was what Lot's wife did and it cost her life. If you delay you will not make it. If you hesitate you may die.


Jesus added in Matthew 24:43, 44.

Mat 24:43  But know this, that if the master of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. 

Mat 24:44  Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. 

This was the warning from Jesus to His disciples to be on guard, and watch out, be ready, time is short. The judgement is going to happen very soon and it will be within their generation.

It was not a warning to us about a future event that is going to happen 2000, 3000, or 4000 years in our future. That is wrong teaching.

It was a warning to the Jews that it was going to happen in a very short while within their timeline. The calamity is coming upon the Jews, and they are to flee to the mountains. Make haste, do not look back, and do not delay, but to escape quickly, and to remember that by delaying Lot's wife lost her life.


Additional note from a commentary of John Gill on why Lot's wife looked back:

[ Remember Lot's wife: whose name by the Jews, is said to be Adith, or Irith, and who, they also say was a native of Sodom; and that the reason of her looking, was either to see what would be the end of her father's house and family; or as others, because her heart yearned after her daughters, and she looked back to see if they followed her; upon which she became a pillar of salt, Gen 19:26. ]



Extra reading on: what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah? (The historical location of Gomorrah was just a short distance away from Gomorrah, and that their histories were connected).

2. Evidence of Sodom? Meteor blast cause of biblical destruction, say scientists
https://www.timesofisrael.com/evidence-of-sodom-meteor-blast-cause-of-biblical-destruction-say-scientists/

Sunday, 4 April 2021

A Metaphorical Example - Revelations 12

 











A Metaphorical Example - Revelations 12


Revelations is a book full of metaphorical language.

An example is in Revelations 12:12-14

12 I looked when He opened the sixth seal, and behold, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became like blood. 

13 And the stars of heaven fell to the earth, as a fig tree drops its late figs when it is shaken by a mighty wind. 

14 Then the sky receded as a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place.



My question: Can it be that the apostle John, who wrote Revelations, would suddenly used literal language, after their people had been using prophetic, apocalyptic, and metaphorical language for thousands of years? Would John suddenly change their ancient and cultural way of writing and thinking?

My 2nd question: Can it be that Jesus, also coming from the same historical and cultural background as John, suddenly used literal language instead of metaphorical language? Thereby causing miscommunication and confusion to His listeners and disciples?

My answer to these questions: Of course, definitely and conclusively NOT!


The book of Revelation was spoken to the Jews to THEIR generation, to THEIR culture, with THEIR understanding. This book has more than 400 references to Hebrew scriptures to prove that it was about the Jews.


There is plenty of evidence to show that the book of Revelations was written before the fall of Jerusalem in AD70. It was written to predict its coming catastrophe. And the purpose of this book, was to warn them before the Great Fall of Jerusalem.


In that Day of Judgement on Jerusalem, their earthly Israel kingdom (the Mosaic and Law system) will be removed, and Jesus will usher in the eternal spiritual kingdom as was promised by Daniel to the Jews.


Revelations was a book about warning them to flee from the destruction that is coming from the Roman invasion on Jerusalem in AD70. Jesus told them not to be caught in the fires of Gehenna (literally the Valley of Hinnom) where the fires will burn their bodies for months after the city of Jerusalem is burnt to the ground.


That was the end of the Old Covenant, the end of the Age of the Mosaic Law system, and the end of the city of Jerusalem as the central place of worship of God. This was exactly what happened according to history.


The writings of the New Testament reveals the same apocalyptic and metaphorical language that is meant to turn the hearts of the Jewish audience from the coming destruction of Jerusalem that the Roman empire will bring to their nation.


It was meant to show the foolishness of their sins and ways, the futility of their religious system, and to point them to the certainty of God's kingdom through Jesus Christ as their Messiah.

If you can understand this from a metaphorical perspective / viewpoint, then literally hundred of bible verses will open up to you and you will see God wasn't in the business of destroying the heavens and earth, but leading us to change our minds and trust in the spiritual kingdom of God through Jesus Christ.

A Metaphorical Example - Isaiah 13

 
















A Metaphorical Example - Isaiah 13

Isaiah 13:6-10 reads:

6 Wail, for the day of the Lord is at hand!
It will come as destruction from the Almighty.

7 Therefore all hands will be limp,
Every man’s heart will melt,

8 And they will be afraid.
Pangs and sorrows will take hold of them;
They will be in pain as a woman in childbirth;
They will be amazed at one another;
Their faces will be like flames.

9 Behold, the day of the Lord comes,
Cruel, with both wrath and fierce anger,
To lay the land desolate;
And He will destroy its sinners from it.

10 For the stars of heaven and their constellations
Will not give their light;
The sun will be darkened in its going forth,
And the moon will not cause its light to shine.


Did every man's heart physically melt? NO.!

This is metaphorical and exaggerated language to describe an imaginary picture of their hearts melting so that it will cause the people to wake up and come to their senses. 

The prophet Isaiah wanted to awaken and shake them up!

These writings describe a literal and physical event that actually happened as shown in the past history.

Qn: How to interpret this?

An: Look at the Context in Isaiah 13:1.

Isaiah 13:1 "The burden against Babylon which Isaiah the son of Amoz saw." 

This was a prophecy predicted by Isaiah about the fall of Babylon in 689 BC! 

When the prophets used the language of sun, moon and stars, it referred to the governmental powers of their times. It meant kings, queens, governors, and leaders would fall from power. 

God did not literally come out of clouds, darken the sun, nor cause the moon to cease its light.

He can (because He is God). But he didn't.


According to ancient Assyrian historical writings:

Notice how King Sennacherib (King of Assyria) uses his language to describe his victory over Babylon:

 “I made its destruction more complete than by a flood. That in days to come the site of that city, and (its) temples and gods, might not be remembered, I completely blotted it out with (floods) of water and made it like a meadow” 

(Daniel D. Luckenbill, Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia, 1926-1927, Vol. 2, p. 152).


This is a Metaphorical Example.


A Metaphorical Example - Psalms 18

 











A Metaphorical Example - Psalms 18

What is metaphorical?

Metaphorical means you use something else to stand for, or symbolize, another thing.

For example, in a poem, "a dark sky" might be a metaphorical representation of sadness.

Let us look at Psalm 18, which is a Psalm of David.

Psalm 18:7-17 reads:


7 Then the earth shook and trembled;
The foundations of the hills also quaked and were shaken,
Because He was angry.


8 Smoke went up from His nostrils,
And devouring fire from His mouth;
Coals were kindled by it.


9 He bowed the heavens also, and came down
With darkness under His feet.


10 And He rode upon a cherub, and flew;
He flew upon the wings of the wind.


11 He made darkness His secret place;
His canopy around Him was dark waters
And thick clouds of the skies.


12 From the brightness before Him,
His thick clouds passed with hailstones and coals of fire.


13 The Lord thundered from heaven,
And the Most High uttered His voice,
Hailstones and coals of fire.


14 He sent out His arrows and scattered the foe,
Lightnings in abundance, and He vanquished them.


15 Then the channels of the sea were seen,
The foundations of the world were uncovered
At Your rebuke, O Lord,
At the blast of the breath of Your nostrils.


16 He sent from above, He took me;
He drew me out of many waters.


17 He delivered me from my strong enemy,
From those who hated me,
For they were too strong for me.



Wow!! : Smoke from His nose, and fire from His mouth!!


Did it really happen? NO.!

Do you know what really happened?

Well, before you read into Psalms 18, it is written in the beginning of the Psalm "To the Chief Musician. A Psalm of David the servant of the Lord, who spoke to the Lord the words of this song on the day that the Lord delivered him from the hand of all his enemies and from the hand of Saul." 

This Psalm is a song recounting how God delivered David from the hand of Saul and his armies (see 2 Samuel 22).

The earth didn't quake.

The oceans didn't break open and expose the channels of the sea.

God simply delivered David in a battle.

It was a very natural event but written in an exaggerated and metaphorical language to make a strong point.


This is called a Metaphorical Example.



No One Knows That Day or Hour

 













No One Knows That Day or Hour

The phrase "No one knows that day or hour" is found in 2 parallel passages of the bible i.e. Matthew 24:36; Mark 13:32; 

Mat 24:36  But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. 

Mar 13:32  But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

In Luke, there was a similar passage about "that day" in Luke 17, and the events that are going to unfold on "that day".

All these passages are a continuation of the conversation between the disciples and Jesus when the disciples asked Jesus the questions in Matthew 24:3.

It is interesting to note that the Strong's Concordance translate "that day" as "that one day", indicating a particular date and day, that these things are going to take place.


Modern day controversy:

Some bible interpreters indicate that "that day" refers to a future day or future date that Jesus was referring to (we shall call them futurists). 

Their explanation was that:

a. They agree that Matthew 24:3-35 was actually referring to the events of the destruction of Jerusalem, and 

b. that Matthew 24:36 was referring to a future event of the "day of judgement/apocalypse or a future 2nd coming of Jesus" that has yet to happen.

c. They call this a transition verse, where Jesus changed His topic or agenda.

My explanation:

I choose to differ from their explanation, because:

a. Jesus did not make a topic change or a topic transition.

b. The conversation of Jesus and His disciples did not change. It was the same thing that Jesus was talking about and conversing with His disciples.


In the parallel passage in Mark 13:4, we read:

Mar 13:4  Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign when ALL THESE THINGS shall be fulfilled? 

and as an answer to their questions, Jesus said in Mark 13:32:

Mar 13:32  But concerning THAT DAY or THAT HOUR, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. 

Jesus answered verse 4 with verse 32. It was a continuous conversation. Jesus did not change topic or transition into another subject, nor talk about another era or time period. Jesus did not change audience. It was all within the same time, in answering to the disciples in front of them.


Qn: Did Jesus gave a clue as to the timing of That Day? 
That Day when all these terrible things are going to happen?

An: Yes, Jesus did. Two verses before Matthew 24;36, we read in
 Matthew 24:34:

Mat 24:34  Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. 

The timing indicator is "this generation shall not pass away".

However, the timing as to the exact "that one day" or "that hour", no one knows, not even Jesus knew.


Qn: Did Jesus himself knew of "That Day"?

An: Some may say that Jesus knows. But Jesus himself said that not even He himself knows.

Why is this?

When Jesus was physically on planet Earth, He was bound by certain limitations. For example, He can only be in 1 place at a time. He was not Omnipresent.

Based on Luke 2:52, we read that Jesus was 12 years old and He was having a discussion with the teachers of the Law in the temple, when His earthly parents were looking for Him. The the verse said:

Luk 2:52  And Jesus increased in wisdom and in stature and in favor with God and man. 

Note: that Jesus had to grow, to advance, to gain wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man. He did not automatically knew everything. He wasn't born earthly to know everything from His Father (God).

Jesus in the physical was not Omniscient. He did not know everything. Jesus only spoke what He heard His Father said. He did what His Father said to do. He did not have all knowledge about every situation.

For example, in Mark 5:30, when a woman touched Him, Jesus did not know who touched Him.

Mar 5:30  And Jesus, perceiving in himself that power had gone out from him, immediately turned about in the crowd and said, “Who touched my garments?” 


That Day vs pregnancy Date

The speculation of the exact "that one day" can be roughly compared in a simple analogy for purpose of clarification.

In a woman's pregnancy, the doctor may give you a particular date of when the baby is going to come out, but we  know that the actual date may differ to several days before of after that stated date. You will not know the exact date or hour of when the baby will be born, but you will know that it will be within that period of time.

Similarly, the actual "that day" of when it shall be is not known, but it shall be within the timing of "all these things that will happen, will definitely take place within their time period, "their generation".


What is the meaning of "That Day"?

Luke 17 tells us the events that will take place on "that day". This is similarly recorded in Matthew 24 and Mark 13.

In Luke 17:30-31, we read:

Luk 17:30  so will it be on the day when the Son of Man is revealed. 

Luk 17:31  On that day, let the one who is on the housetop, with his goods in the house, not come down to take them away, and likewise let the one who is in the field not turn back. 

These verses quoting "in that day" is a direct reference to the fall of Jerusalem, and not some future event or day.

In his book John L. Bray called "Matthew 24 fulfilled", he said:

["That Day" is the culmination of "those days"]


Qn: What are "those days"? 
Or What are "those last days"?

An: Those days refer to everything that Jesus said from Matthew 24:3-35. These are the last days.

So verse 36 "that day" is  the culmination (highest or climatic point) of verse 3-35 "those days"

There was no indication that the events had changed from verse 35 to verse 36. We can conclude that we are dealing with the same events.


Note: When the disciples were told that it will happen in their generation, and that they did not know the exact moment. It was enough. It was not too vague or uncertain. Jesus did not leave them dangling in hopelessness because Jesus told them that they just need to know the signs, the landmarks or indicators that will happen in their generation along their way. And all these signs were very clearly foretold to them in all the parallel passages above.


John Lightfoot, an early Christian writer, wrote about "that day and hour".

[Of what day and hour? That the discourse is of the day of the destruction of Jerusalem, is so evident, both by the disciples' question, and by the whole thread of Christ's discourse - that it is a wonder, any should understand these words of the day and hour of the Last Judgement.]


Another prominent Christian writer John Gill, in his 1809 commentary on Matthew 24:36 (his commentary is freely available in e-sword app).

[But of that day and hour knoweth no man,.... Which is to be understood, not of the second coming of Christ, the end of the world, and the last judgment; but of the coming of the son of man, to take vengeance on the Jews, and of their destruction; for the words manifestly regard the date of the several things going before, which only can be applied to that catastrophe, and dreadful desolation: now, though the destruction itself was spoken of by Moses and the prophets, was foretold by Christ, and the believing Jews had some discerning of its near approach; (see Heb 10:25) yet the exact and precise time was not known; ]


Another early Christian writer, N. Nisbett in 1787 in his book title "An attempt to illustrate various important passages in the Epistles, etc. of the New Testament, from our Lord's prophecies of the destruction of Jerusalem from some prophecies of the Old Testament." talked about Matthew 24:36

[ But though the time was hastening on for the completion of our Lord’s prophecy of the ruin of the Jews; yet the exact time of this judgment, laid hid in the bosom of the Father. Verse 36. ‘Of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.’ St. Mark has it: ‘Neither the Son, but the Father;’ but the sense is the same. Some men of great learning and eminence have thought that our Lord is here speaking, not of the destruction of Jerusalem, but of that more solemn and awful one of the day of judgment. But I can by no means think that the Evangelists are such loose, inaccurate writers, as to make so sudden and abrupt a transition, as they are here supposed to do; much less to break through the fundamental rules of good writing, by apparently referring to something which they had said before; when in reality they were beginning a new subject, and the absurdity of the supposition will appear more strongly, if it is recollected that the question of the disciples was, ‘When shall these things be?’ ‘Why,’ says our Saviour, ‘of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only’” ]


In conclusion: The judgement on Jerusalem is about to fall soon. This judgement will come suddenly and without further warning like in the flood that occurred at the time of Noah.

Mat 24:37  For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 

Mat 24:38  For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 

Mat 24:39  and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 


Fold the Old Garment

This judgement was about to fall on the Mosaic system and the Jews who crucified Jesus Christ. Just like in the flood, it came and took all of them away. That judgement (that physically and historically occurred in AD70) is going to be the same and to take them all away.

The whole Jewish system of Mosaic Law is going to be completely take away. In fact, to be folded up like a garment as described in Hebrews 1.

Heb 1:11  they will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment,

Heb 1:12  like a robe you will roll them up, like a garment they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will have no end.” 

Jesus spoke about an old garment and a new garment, and that you cannot put a patch on an old garment (Luke 5:36)

So what do you do with an old garment?

You just fold it up and put it away. You then put on a new garment, and that garment is Jesus Christ.